Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Behaviour analysis across different types of En...
View graph of relations

Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities. / Rowe, Matthew; Fernandez, Miriam; Alani, Harith et al.
ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM Press, 2012. p. 387-396.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Rowe, M, Fernandez, M, Alani, H, Ronen, I, Hayes, C & Karnstedt, M 2012, Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities. in ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings. ACM Press, New York, pp. 387-396, Web Science Conference, United States, 22/06/12. <http://www.syndiosocial.com/docs/WebSci2012/WebSci2012FinalProceedings.pdf>

APA

Rowe, M., Fernandez, M., Alani, H., Ronen, I., Hayes, C., & Karnstedt, M. (2012). Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities. In ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings (pp. 387-396). ACM Press. http://www.syndiosocial.com/docs/WebSci2012/WebSci2012FinalProceedings.pdf

Vancouver

Rowe M, Fernandez M, Alani H, Ronen I, Hayes C, Karnstedt M. Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities. In ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM Press. 2012. p. 387-396

Author

Rowe, Matthew ; Fernandez, Miriam ; Alani, Harith et al. / Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities. ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings. New York : ACM Press, 2012. pp. 387-396

Bibtex

@inproceedings{ec9ba1bd672f4e099f0caef070b32690,
title = "Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities",
abstract = "Online communities in the enterprise are designed to fulfil some economic purpose, for example for supporting products or enabling work-collaboration between knowledge workers.The intentions of such communities allow them to be labelled based on their type - i.e. communities of practice, team communities, technical support communities, etc. Despite the disparate nature and explicit intention of community types, little is known of how the types differ in terms of a) the participation and activity, and b) the behaviour of community users. Such insights could provide communitymanagers with an understanding of normality and a diagnosis of healthiness in their community, given its type and corresponding user needs. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of community types from the enterprise social software system IBM Connections. We assess the micro (userlevel) and macro (community-level) characteristics of differing community types and identify key differences in the behaviour that users exhibit in these communities. We furtherqualify our empirical findings with user questionnaires by identifying links between the objectives of the users and the characteristics of the community types.",
author = "Matthew Rowe and Miriam Fernandez and Harith Alani and Inbal Ronen and Conor Hayes and Marcel Karnstedt",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4503-1228-8",
pages = "387--396",
booktitle = "ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings",
publisher = "ACM Press",
note = "Web Science Conference ; Conference date: 22-06-2012",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Behaviour analysis across different types of Enterprise Online Communities

AU - Rowe, Matthew

AU - Fernandez, Miriam

AU - Alani, Harith

AU - Ronen, Inbal

AU - Hayes, Conor

AU - Karnstedt, Marcel

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Online communities in the enterprise are designed to fulfil some economic purpose, for example for supporting products or enabling work-collaboration between knowledge workers.The intentions of such communities allow them to be labelled based on their type - i.e. communities of practice, team communities, technical support communities, etc. Despite the disparate nature and explicit intention of community types, little is known of how the types differ in terms of a) the participation and activity, and b) the behaviour of community users. Such insights could provide communitymanagers with an understanding of normality and a diagnosis of healthiness in their community, given its type and corresponding user needs. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of community types from the enterprise social software system IBM Connections. We assess the micro (userlevel) and macro (community-level) characteristics of differing community types and identify key differences in the behaviour that users exhibit in these communities. We furtherqualify our empirical findings with user questionnaires by identifying links between the objectives of the users and the characteristics of the community types.

AB - Online communities in the enterprise are designed to fulfil some economic purpose, for example for supporting products or enabling work-collaboration between knowledge workers.The intentions of such communities allow them to be labelled based on their type - i.e. communities of practice, team communities, technical support communities, etc. Despite the disparate nature and explicit intention of community types, little is known of how the types differ in terms of a) the participation and activity, and b) the behaviour of community users. Such insights could provide communitymanagers with an understanding of normality and a diagnosis of healthiness in their community, given its type and corresponding user needs. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of community types from the enterprise social software system IBM Connections. We assess the micro (userlevel) and macro (community-level) characteristics of differing community types and identify key differences in the behaviour that users exhibit in these communities. We furtherqualify our empirical findings with user questionnaires by identifying links between the objectives of the users and the characteristics of the community types.

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 978-1-4503-1228-8

SP - 387

EP - 396

BT - ACM Web Science2012 : Conference Proceedings

PB - ACM Press

CY - New York

T2 - Web Science Conference

Y2 - 22 June 2012

ER -