Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Being active and impulsive
View graph of relations

Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. / Helper , Justin; Albarracin, Dolores ; McCulloch, Kathleen Cameron et al.
In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 36, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 416-424.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Helper , J, Albarracin, D, McCulloch, KC & Noguchi, K 2012, 'Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control', Motivation and Emotion, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

APA

Vancouver

Helper J, Albarracin D, McCulloch KC, Noguchi K. Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion. 2012 Dec;36(4):416-424. doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

Author

Helper , Justin ; Albarracin, Dolores ; McCulloch, Kathleen Cameron et al. / Being active and impulsive : the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 416-424.

Bibtex

@article{5a51fef9d2644ce3b4a281bb398096f5,
title = "Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control",
abstract = "Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.",
keywords = "Self-control, Inhibition, Action, Inaction, General goals",
author = "Justin Helper and Dolores Albarracin and McCulloch, {Kathleen Cameron} and Kenji Noguchi",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "416--424",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being active and impulsive

T2 - the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control

AU - Helper , Justin

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

AU - McCulloch, Kathleen Cameron

AU - Noguchi, Kenji

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.

AB - Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.

KW - Self-control

KW - Inhibition

KW - Action

KW - Inaction

KW - General goals

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

DO - 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 416

EP - 424

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 4

ER -