Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Benefits and challenges of collaborative research
View graph of relations

Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care. / Payne, Sheila; Seymour, J.; Molassiotis, A. et al.
In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, Vol. 1, No. 1, 06.2011, p. 5-11.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

Payne, S, Seymour, J, Molassiotis, A, Froggatt, K, Grande, G, Lloyd-Williams, M, Foster, C, Wilson, R, Rolls, L, Todd, C & Addington-Hall, J 2011, 'Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care', BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018

APA

Payne, S., Seymour, J., Molassiotis, A., Froggatt, K., Grande, G., Lloyd-Williams, M., Foster, C., Wilson, R., Rolls, L., Todd, C., & Addington-Hall, J. (2011). Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, 1(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018

Vancouver

Payne S, Seymour J, Molassiotis A, Froggatt K, Grande G, Lloyd-Williams M et al. Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. 2011 Jun;1(1):5-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018

Author

Payne, Sheila ; Seymour, J. ; Molassiotis, A. et al. / Benefits and challenges of collaborative research : lessons from supportive and palliative care. In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. 2011 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 5-11.

Bibtex

@article{27272f5e548046a5b232ceb877a54db2,
title = "Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care",
abstract = "Objective To describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.Design A descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.Setting Research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.Participants 26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.Findings The aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.Conclusions The activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources.",
author = "Sheila Payne and J. Seymour and A. Molassiotis and Katherine Froggatt and G. Grande and M. Lloyd-Williams and C. Foster and R. Wilson and L. Rolls and C. Todd and J. Addington-Hall",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "5--11",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-4368",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits and challenges of collaborative research

T2 - lessons from supportive and palliative care

AU - Payne, Sheila

AU - Seymour, J.

AU - Molassiotis, A.

AU - Froggatt, Katherine

AU - Grande, G.

AU - Lloyd-Williams, M.

AU - Foster, C.

AU - Wilson, R.

AU - Rolls, L.

AU - Todd, C.

AU - Addington-Hall, J.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Objective To describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.Design A descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.Setting Research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.Participants 26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.Findings The aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.Conclusions The activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources.

AB - Objective To describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.Design A descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.Setting Research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.Participants 26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.Findings The aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.Conclusions The activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81355142101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018

DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:81355142101

VL - 1

SP - 5

EP - 11

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-4368

IS - 1

ER -