Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Biodiversity and land-use change
View graph of relations

Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Biodiversity and land-use change : understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage. / de Lima, Ricardo Faustino; Dallimer, Martin; Atkinson, Philip W.; Barlow, Jos.

In: Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 411-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

de Lima, RF, Dallimer, M, Atkinson, PW & Barlow, J 2013, 'Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage', Diversity and Distributions, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12015

APA

de Lima, R. F., Dallimer, M., Atkinson, P. W., & Barlow, J. (2013). Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage. Diversity and Distributions, 19(4), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12015

Vancouver

Author

de Lima, Ricardo Faustino ; Dallimer, Martin ; Atkinson, Philip W. ; Barlow, Jos. / Biodiversity and land-use change : understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage. In: Diversity and Distributions. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 411-422.

Bibtex

@article{ae5154dea7244bb5810665ca9fd6eb1e,
title = "Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage",
abstract = "Aim Anthropogenic land-use change is a major driver of the current extinction crisis, but the processes through which it acts on biodiversity are complex and still poorly understood. Here, we use several biodiversity metrics to make a comprehensive assessment of the response of an endemic-rich bird assemblage to land-use change. Location SAo Tome Island (SAo Tome and Principe, Africa). Methods We sampled bird assemblages in 220 point counts, stratified across three regions and four land-use types. Species richness was examined using accumulation curves and generalized linear mixed-effect models. Compositional and structural changes were analysed with ordination techniques. We used correlations and model selection to identify species traits and environmental variables associated with such changes. Results At the point level, there was a slight decrease of species richness in more intensive land uses. However, higher dissimilarities within these land uses led them to have higher overall species richness. Endemics dominated forest environments and, although most preferred less-disturbed land uses, many persisted across all land uses. Non-endemics were virtually absent from forests, but became very abundant in the more intensive land uses. Canopy cover was the best predictor of the shift between endemic and non-endemic species, and allowed identifying regional differences in the local responses of bird assemblages to land-use change. Main conclusions To better understand biodiversity, it is crucial to use several metrics simultaneously. In SAo Tome, simply using species richness, the single most used biodiversity metric, could have been misleading as it concealed major shifts in the bird assemblage structure towards an endemism impoverished avifauna. Despite scarce data on land-use cover, we demonstrate how landscape context can be vital to understand biodiversity patterns and that highly forested surroundings might overestimate the strict value of more intensive land uses. Our results raise concerns about the long-term persistence of endemic species restricted to islands where forested land uses are being lost.",
keywords = "DEFORESTATION, landscape context, assemblage composition and structure, PATTERNS, TOME-AND-PRINCIPE, DIVERSITY, ISLAND, tropical forest, SPECIES RICHNESS, species richness, biodiversity loss, FOREST, SAo Tome island, LANDSCAPES, AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, CONSERVATION",
author = "{de Lima}, {Ricardo Faustino} and Martin Dallimer and Atkinson, {Philip W.} and Jos Barlow",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/ddi.12015",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "411--422",
journal = "Diversity and Distributions",
issn = "1366-9516",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity and land-use change

T2 - understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage

AU - de Lima, Ricardo Faustino

AU - Dallimer, Martin

AU - Atkinson, Philip W.

AU - Barlow, Jos

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Aim Anthropogenic land-use change is a major driver of the current extinction crisis, but the processes through which it acts on biodiversity are complex and still poorly understood. Here, we use several biodiversity metrics to make a comprehensive assessment of the response of an endemic-rich bird assemblage to land-use change. Location SAo Tome Island (SAo Tome and Principe, Africa). Methods We sampled bird assemblages in 220 point counts, stratified across three regions and four land-use types. Species richness was examined using accumulation curves and generalized linear mixed-effect models. Compositional and structural changes were analysed with ordination techniques. We used correlations and model selection to identify species traits and environmental variables associated with such changes. Results At the point level, there was a slight decrease of species richness in more intensive land uses. However, higher dissimilarities within these land uses led them to have higher overall species richness. Endemics dominated forest environments and, although most preferred less-disturbed land uses, many persisted across all land uses. Non-endemics were virtually absent from forests, but became very abundant in the more intensive land uses. Canopy cover was the best predictor of the shift between endemic and non-endemic species, and allowed identifying regional differences in the local responses of bird assemblages to land-use change. Main conclusions To better understand biodiversity, it is crucial to use several metrics simultaneously. In SAo Tome, simply using species richness, the single most used biodiversity metric, could have been misleading as it concealed major shifts in the bird assemblage structure towards an endemism impoverished avifauna. Despite scarce data on land-use cover, we demonstrate how landscape context can be vital to understand biodiversity patterns and that highly forested surroundings might overestimate the strict value of more intensive land uses. Our results raise concerns about the long-term persistence of endemic species restricted to islands where forested land uses are being lost.

AB - Aim Anthropogenic land-use change is a major driver of the current extinction crisis, but the processes through which it acts on biodiversity are complex and still poorly understood. Here, we use several biodiversity metrics to make a comprehensive assessment of the response of an endemic-rich bird assemblage to land-use change. Location SAo Tome Island (SAo Tome and Principe, Africa). Methods We sampled bird assemblages in 220 point counts, stratified across three regions and four land-use types. Species richness was examined using accumulation curves and generalized linear mixed-effect models. Compositional and structural changes were analysed with ordination techniques. We used correlations and model selection to identify species traits and environmental variables associated with such changes. Results At the point level, there was a slight decrease of species richness in more intensive land uses. However, higher dissimilarities within these land uses led them to have higher overall species richness. Endemics dominated forest environments and, although most preferred less-disturbed land uses, many persisted across all land uses. Non-endemics were virtually absent from forests, but became very abundant in the more intensive land uses. Canopy cover was the best predictor of the shift between endemic and non-endemic species, and allowed identifying regional differences in the local responses of bird assemblages to land-use change. Main conclusions To better understand biodiversity, it is crucial to use several metrics simultaneously. In SAo Tome, simply using species richness, the single most used biodiversity metric, could have been misleading as it concealed major shifts in the bird assemblage structure towards an endemism impoverished avifauna. Despite scarce data on land-use cover, we demonstrate how landscape context can be vital to understand biodiversity patterns and that highly forested surroundings might overestimate the strict value of more intensive land uses. Our results raise concerns about the long-term persistence of endemic species restricted to islands where forested land uses are being lost.

KW - DEFORESTATION

KW - landscape context

KW - assemblage composition and structure

KW - PATTERNS

KW - TOME-AND-PRINCIPE

KW - DIVERSITY

KW - ISLAND

KW - tropical forest

KW - SPECIES RICHNESS

KW - species richness

KW - biodiversity loss

KW - FOREST

KW - SAo Tome island

KW - LANDSCAPES

KW - AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY

KW - CONSERVATION

U2 - 10.1111/ddi.12015

DO - 10.1111/ddi.12015

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 411

EP - 422

JO - Diversity and Distributions

JF - Diversity and Distributions

SN - 1366-9516

IS - 4

ER -