Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Branching points for transition pathways
View graph of relations

Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future. / Foxon, Timothy J.; Pearson, Peter J. G.; Arapostathis, Stathis et al.
In: Energy Policy, Vol. 52, 01.2013, p. 146–158.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Foxon TJ, Pearson PJG, Arapostathis S, Carlsson-Hyslop A, Thornton J. Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future. Energy Policy. 2013 Jan;52:146–158. Epub 2012 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.030

Author

Foxon, Timothy J. ; Pearson, Peter J. G. ; Arapostathis, Stathis et al. / Branching points for transition pathways : assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future. In: Energy Policy. 2013 ; Vol. 52. pp. 146–158.

Bibtex

@article{7dc61e3518184d36879fc306a6f1c9c9,
title = "Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future",
abstract = "This paper describes initial analysis of branching points on a set of transition pathways to a UK low carbon electricity future by 2050. As described in other papers in this special issue, we are exploring and analysing a set of core transition pathways, based on alternative governance patterns in which the {\textquoteleft}logics{\textquoteright} of market actors, government actors and civil society actors, respectively dominate. This core pathway analysis is enhanced by analyses of branching points within and across the pathways, which informs how competition between different logics plays out at key decision points. Branching points are defined as key decision points at which choices made by actors, in response to internal or external stresses or triggers, determine whether and in what ways the pathway is followed. A set of initial branching points for our three core transition pathways is identified through project and stakeholder workshops, and drawing on analysis of actors{\textquoteright} choices and responses at past branching points in energy system transitions. The potential responses of the actors are identified at these branching points, and risk mitigation strategies are formulated for the dominant actors to reinforce that pathway, as well as opportunities for actors to move away from the pathway.",
keywords = "Branching points, Transition pathways , Path dependency",
author = "Foxon, {Timothy J.} and Pearson, {Peter J. G.} and Stathis Arapostathis and Anna Carlsson-Hyslop and Judith Thornton",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.030",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "146–158",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Branching points for transition pathways

T2 - assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future

AU - Foxon, Timothy J.

AU - Pearson, Peter J. G.

AU - Arapostathis, Stathis

AU - Carlsson-Hyslop, Anna

AU - Thornton, Judith

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - This paper describes initial analysis of branching points on a set of transition pathways to a UK low carbon electricity future by 2050. As described in other papers in this special issue, we are exploring and analysing a set of core transition pathways, based on alternative governance patterns in which the ‘logics’ of market actors, government actors and civil society actors, respectively dominate. This core pathway analysis is enhanced by analyses of branching points within and across the pathways, which informs how competition between different logics plays out at key decision points. Branching points are defined as key decision points at which choices made by actors, in response to internal or external stresses or triggers, determine whether and in what ways the pathway is followed. A set of initial branching points for our three core transition pathways is identified through project and stakeholder workshops, and drawing on analysis of actors’ choices and responses at past branching points in energy system transitions. The potential responses of the actors are identified at these branching points, and risk mitigation strategies are formulated for the dominant actors to reinforce that pathway, as well as opportunities for actors to move away from the pathway.

AB - This paper describes initial analysis of branching points on a set of transition pathways to a UK low carbon electricity future by 2050. As described in other papers in this special issue, we are exploring and analysing a set of core transition pathways, based on alternative governance patterns in which the ‘logics’ of market actors, government actors and civil society actors, respectively dominate. This core pathway analysis is enhanced by analyses of branching points within and across the pathways, which informs how competition between different logics plays out at key decision points. Branching points are defined as key decision points at which choices made by actors, in response to internal or external stresses or triggers, determine whether and in what ways the pathway is followed. A set of initial branching points for our three core transition pathways is identified through project and stakeholder workshops, and drawing on analysis of actors’ choices and responses at past branching points in energy system transitions. The potential responses of the actors are identified at these branching points, and risk mitigation strategies are formulated for the dominant actors to reinforce that pathway, as well as opportunities for actors to move away from the pathway.

KW - Branching points

KW - Transition pathways

KW - Path dependency

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.030

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.030

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 146

EP - 158

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -