Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Brexit Anxiety

Electronic data

  • CRISPP_Manuscript_Brexit_Anxiety_final_version

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy on 15/02/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438334

    Accepted author manuscript, 560 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 15/08/19

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Brexit Anxiety: A Case Study in the Medicalization of Dissent

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>15/02/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Number of pages18
StateE-pub ahead of print
Early online date15/02/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This paper illustrates how concepts of mental disorder have been deployed to medicalize negative emotions and, thereby, weaken the political agency of some individuals. First, I theorise the link between political agency and emotions, arguing that effective political action entails the transformation of emotions into public issues. Using the British referendum on membership in the EU as a case study, I then examine how medically loaded terms and rhetoric were used to describe suffering after the vote. Finally, I argue that this generated conditions that interrupted or even reversed the transformation of subjective experiences into politically meaningful issues.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy on 15/02/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438334