Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Businesswomen and war metaphors
View graph of relations

Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious? / Koller, Veronika.
In: Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 02.2004, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koller V. Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious? Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2004 Feb;8(1):3-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x

Author

Koller, Veronika. / Businesswomen and war metaphors : possessive, jealous and pugnacious?. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 3-22.

Bibtex

@article{dff856b6be4e4912a9d03819136cfa61,
title = "Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious?",
abstract = "This paper investigates the metaphors employed for the description of women managers, hypothesising that using the war metaphor in this context reflects the hegemonic masculinity determining business discourse. To test the hypothesis, cognitive metaphor theory in combination with Critical Discourse Analysis is applied to two corpora of business magazine features on executives. Metaphorical expressions used to describe businesswomen are extracted from one corpus, and these expressions are then contrasted with those for businessmen. Moreover, the initial corpus is scanned for alternative metaphors for businesswomen. Findings indicate that metaphorical expressions such as corporate killer are used for first‐ and third‐person reference across genders. Hence, the metaphorical concept businesswomen are warriors and the male prototype it sustains seem pervasive. Moreover, alternatives like businesswomen are cheerleaders/nurturers are not necessarily counter‐discursive as they reproduce the binary gender paradigm characterising hegemonic masculinity.",
author = "Veronika Koller",
year = "2004",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Journal of Sociolinguistics",
issn = "1360-6441",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Businesswomen and war metaphors

T2 - possessive, jealous and pugnacious?

AU - Koller, Veronika

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - This paper investigates the metaphors employed for the description of women managers, hypothesising that using the war metaphor in this context reflects the hegemonic masculinity determining business discourse. To test the hypothesis, cognitive metaphor theory in combination with Critical Discourse Analysis is applied to two corpora of business magazine features on executives. Metaphorical expressions used to describe businesswomen are extracted from one corpus, and these expressions are then contrasted with those for businessmen. Moreover, the initial corpus is scanned for alternative metaphors for businesswomen. Findings indicate that metaphorical expressions such as corporate killer are used for first‐ and third‐person reference across genders. Hence, the metaphorical concept businesswomen are warriors and the male prototype it sustains seem pervasive. Moreover, alternatives like businesswomen are cheerleaders/nurturers are not necessarily counter‐discursive as they reproduce the binary gender paradigm characterising hegemonic masculinity.

AB - This paper investigates the metaphors employed for the description of women managers, hypothesising that using the war metaphor in this context reflects the hegemonic masculinity determining business discourse. To test the hypothesis, cognitive metaphor theory in combination with Critical Discourse Analysis is applied to two corpora of business magazine features on executives. Metaphorical expressions used to describe businesswomen are extracted from one corpus, and these expressions are then contrasted with those for businessmen. Moreover, the initial corpus is scanned for alternative metaphors for businesswomen. Findings indicate that metaphorical expressions such as corporate killer are used for first‐ and third‐person reference across genders. Hence, the metaphorical concept businesswomen are warriors and the male prototype it sustains seem pervasive. Moreover, alternatives like businesswomen are cheerleaders/nurturers are not necessarily counter‐discursive as they reproduce the binary gender paradigm characterising hegemonic masculinity.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Sociolinguistics

JF - Journal of Sociolinguistics

SN - 1360-6441

IS - 1

ER -