Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > "But is this law?" The nature of law, sovereign...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

"But is this law?" The nature of law, sovereign power and justice in Hamlet.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

"But is this law?" The nature of law, sovereign power and justice in Hamlet. / Ost, Suzanne.

In: Law and Humanities, Vol. 2, 2007, p. 31-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{bc60dbb3667849f4aaa08ea2cf8f366a,
title = "{"}But is this law?{"} The nature of law, sovereign power and justice in Hamlet.",
abstract = "This paper addresses questions of legal and political theory concerning representations of law, sovereign power and justice within Shakespeare{\textquoteright}s most famous tragedy. DiMatteo has effectively demonstrated how Hamlet can be seen as a critique of the theory of sovereignty based upon reason of state, a revelation of the consequences of failing to consider the proper constraints that can and should be placed upon sovereign power by common reason. I explore how the play emphasises the significance of the restraints that can be placed upon the sovereign and indeed, Hamlet himself, by natural law and justice. Applying the natural law theories of Shakespeare{\textquoteright}s contemporaries and John Finnis{\textquoteright}modern theory of natural law, I will argue that Claudius is an illegitimate figurehead of state and law whose exercise of practical reason and prudentia is flawed, and that his actions cause his law to lack the moral content demanded of {\textquoteleft}law{\textquoteright} worthy of that name. Whilst Claudius{\textquoteright} rule is that which the people of Denmark actually experience in Hamlet,until the end of the play, the Danish people face the prospect of Hamlet{\textquoteright}s future reign as Claudius{\textquoteright} successor. Thus, in part II of this paper, I will assess Hamlet{\textquoteright}s unfulfilled potential as a sovereign lawmaker and consider whether his philosophical, cautious nature would have been apt for this role.",
keywords = "Hamlet, Shakespeare, natural law, Finnis",
author = "Suzanne Ost",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "31--56",
journal = "Law and Humanities",
issn = "1752-1483",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "But is this law?" The nature of law, sovereign power and justice in Hamlet.

AU - Ost, Suzanne

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper addresses questions of legal and political theory concerning representations of law, sovereign power and justice within Shakespeare’s most famous tragedy. DiMatteo has effectively demonstrated how Hamlet can be seen as a critique of the theory of sovereignty based upon reason of state, a revelation of the consequences of failing to consider the proper constraints that can and should be placed upon sovereign power by common reason. I explore how the play emphasises the significance of the restraints that can be placed upon the sovereign and indeed, Hamlet himself, by natural law and justice. Applying the natural law theories of Shakespeare’s contemporaries and John Finnis’modern theory of natural law, I will argue that Claudius is an illegitimate figurehead of state and law whose exercise of practical reason and prudentia is flawed, and that his actions cause his law to lack the moral content demanded of ‘law’ worthy of that name. Whilst Claudius’ rule is that which the people of Denmark actually experience in Hamlet,until the end of the play, the Danish people face the prospect of Hamlet’s future reign as Claudius’ successor. Thus, in part II of this paper, I will assess Hamlet’s unfulfilled potential as a sovereign lawmaker and consider whether his philosophical, cautious nature would have been apt for this role.

AB - This paper addresses questions of legal and political theory concerning representations of law, sovereign power and justice within Shakespeare’s most famous tragedy. DiMatteo has effectively demonstrated how Hamlet can be seen as a critique of the theory of sovereignty based upon reason of state, a revelation of the consequences of failing to consider the proper constraints that can and should be placed upon sovereign power by common reason. I explore how the play emphasises the significance of the restraints that can be placed upon the sovereign and indeed, Hamlet himself, by natural law and justice. Applying the natural law theories of Shakespeare’s contemporaries and John Finnis’modern theory of natural law, I will argue that Claudius is an illegitimate figurehead of state and law whose exercise of practical reason and prudentia is flawed, and that his actions cause his law to lack the moral content demanded of ‘law’ worthy of that name. Whilst Claudius’ rule is that which the people of Denmark actually experience in Hamlet,until the end of the play, the Danish people face the prospect of Hamlet’s future reign as Claudius’ successor. Thus, in part II of this paper, I will assess Hamlet’s unfulfilled potential as a sovereign lawmaker and consider whether his philosophical, cautious nature would have been apt for this role.

KW - Hamlet

KW - Shakespeare

KW - natural law

KW - Finnis

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 31

EP - 56

JO - Law and Humanities

JF - Law and Humanities

SN - 1752-1483

ER -