Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Can digital image classification be used as a s...

Electronic data

  • Baxendale et al 2015 Author final version

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 68, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.13 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Can digital image classification be used as a standardised method for surveying peatland vegetation cover?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Can digital image classification be used as a standardised method for surveying peatland vegetation cover? / Baxendale, Catherine Louise; Ostle, Nicholas John; Wood, C. M. et al.
In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 68, 09.2016, p. 150-156.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Baxendale CL, Ostle NJ, Wood CM, Oakley S, Ward SE. Can digital image classification be used as a standardised method for surveying peatland vegetation cover? Ecological Indicators. 2016 Sept;68:150-156. Epub 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035

Author

Bibtex

@article{3d588adad8dc43df847c3ad0dbd7e1cc,
title = "Can digital image classification be used as a standardised method for surveying peatland vegetation cover?",
abstract = "The ability to carry out systematic, accurate and repeatable vegetation surveys is an essential part of long-term scientific studies into ecosystem biodiversity and functioning. However, current widely used traditional survey techniques such as destructive harvests, pin frame quadrats and visual cover estimates can be very time consuming and are prone to subjective variations. We investigated the use of digital image techniques as an alternative way of recording vegetation cover to plant functional type level on a peatland ecosystem. Using an established plant manipulation experimental site at Moor House NNR (an Environmental Change Network site), we compared visual cover estimates of peatland vegetation with cover estimates using digital image classification methods, from 0.5 m × 0.5 m field plots. Our results show that digital image classification of photographs taken with a standard digital camera can be used successfully to estimate dwarf-shrub and graminoid vegetation cover at a comparable level to field visual cover estimates, although the methods were less effective for lower plants such as mosses and lichens. Our study illustrates the novel application of digital image techniques to provide a new way of measuring and monitoring peatland vegetation to the plant functional group level, which is less vulnerable to surveyor bias than are visual field surveys. Furthermore, as such digital techniques are highly repeatable, we suggest that they have potential for use in long-term monitoring studies, at both plot and landscape scales.",
keywords = "Digital imaging, Peatlands, Vegetation survey, Plant functional type, Long-term monitoring, Moor House NNR",
author = "Baxendale, {Catherine Louise} and Ostle, {Nicholas John} and Wood, {C. M.} and Simon Oakley and Ward, {Susan Elizabeth}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 68, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "150--156",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can digital image classification be used as a standardised method for surveying peatland vegetation cover?

AU - Baxendale, Catherine Louise

AU - Ostle, Nicholas John

AU - Wood, C. M.

AU - Oakley, Simon

AU - Ward, Susan Elizabeth

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 68, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - The ability to carry out systematic, accurate and repeatable vegetation surveys is an essential part of long-term scientific studies into ecosystem biodiversity and functioning. However, current widely used traditional survey techniques such as destructive harvests, pin frame quadrats and visual cover estimates can be very time consuming and are prone to subjective variations. We investigated the use of digital image techniques as an alternative way of recording vegetation cover to plant functional type level on a peatland ecosystem. Using an established plant manipulation experimental site at Moor House NNR (an Environmental Change Network site), we compared visual cover estimates of peatland vegetation with cover estimates using digital image classification methods, from 0.5 m × 0.5 m field plots. Our results show that digital image classification of photographs taken with a standard digital camera can be used successfully to estimate dwarf-shrub and graminoid vegetation cover at a comparable level to field visual cover estimates, although the methods were less effective for lower plants such as mosses and lichens. Our study illustrates the novel application of digital image techniques to provide a new way of measuring and monitoring peatland vegetation to the plant functional group level, which is less vulnerable to surveyor bias than are visual field surveys. Furthermore, as such digital techniques are highly repeatable, we suggest that they have potential for use in long-term monitoring studies, at both plot and landscape scales.

AB - The ability to carry out systematic, accurate and repeatable vegetation surveys is an essential part of long-term scientific studies into ecosystem biodiversity and functioning. However, current widely used traditional survey techniques such as destructive harvests, pin frame quadrats and visual cover estimates can be very time consuming and are prone to subjective variations. We investigated the use of digital image techniques as an alternative way of recording vegetation cover to plant functional type level on a peatland ecosystem. Using an established plant manipulation experimental site at Moor House NNR (an Environmental Change Network site), we compared visual cover estimates of peatland vegetation with cover estimates using digital image classification methods, from 0.5 m × 0.5 m field plots. Our results show that digital image classification of photographs taken with a standard digital camera can be used successfully to estimate dwarf-shrub and graminoid vegetation cover at a comparable level to field visual cover estimates, although the methods were less effective for lower plants such as mosses and lichens. Our study illustrates the novel application of digital image techniques to provide a new way of measuring and monitoring peatland vegetation to the plant functional group level, which is less vulnerable to surveyor bias than are visual field surveys. Furthermore, as such digital techniques are highly repeatable, we suggest that they have potential for use in long-term monitoring studies, at both plot and landscape scales.

KW - Digital imaging

KW - Peatlands

KW - Vegetation survey

KW - Plant functional type

KW - Long-term monitoring

KW - Moor House NNR

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.035

M3 - Journal article

VL - 68

SP - 150

EP - 156

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -