Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect...

Electronic data

  • NCC_preprint

    Rights statement: © 2018 Springer Nature Limited. All rights reserved. The Author's Accepted Manuscript (the accepted version of the manuscript as submitted by the author) may only be posted 6 months after the paper is published, consistent with our self-archiving embargo. Please note that the Author’s Accepted Manuscript may not be released under a Creative Commons license. For Nature Research Terms of Reuse of archived manuscripts please see: http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/license.html#terms

    Accepted author manuscript, 4.42 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>16/07/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Nature Climate Change
Issue number8
Volume8
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)744-749
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

As one of Earth’s most carbon-dense regions, tropical forests are central to climate change mitigation efforts. Their unparalleled species richness also makes them vital for safeguarding biodiversity. However, because research has not been conducted at management-relevant scales and has often not accounted for forest disturbance, the biodiversity implications of carbon conservation strategies remain poorly understood. We investigated tropical carbon–biodiversity relationships and trade-offs along a forest-disturbance gradient, using detailed and extensive carbon and biodiversity datasets. Biodiversity was positively associated with carbon in secondary and highly disturbed primary forests. Positive carbon–biodiversity relationships dissipated at around 100 MgC ha–1, meaning that in less disturbed forests more carbon did not equal more biodiversity. Simulated carbon conservation schemes therefore failed to protect many species in the most species-rich forests. These biodiversity shortfalls were sensitive to opportunity costs and could be decreased for small carbon penalties. To ensure that the most ecologically valuable forests are protected, biodiversity needs to be incorporated into carbon conservation planning.

Bibliographic note

© 2018 Springer Nature Limited. All rights reserved.