Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Caution ahead
View graph of relations

Caution ahead: teachers, vetting and the law

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Caution ahead: teachers, vetting and the law. / Gillespie, Alisdair.
In: Education and the Law, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2006, p. 19-30.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gillespie A. Caution ahead: teachers, vetting and the law. Education and the Law. 2006;18(1):19-30. doi: 10.1080/09539960600720516

Author

Gillespie, Alisdair. / Caution ahead : teachers, vetting and the law. In: Education and the Law. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 19-30.

Bibtex

@article{f706cf09d9534b7ba9364af434e32a0e,
title = "Caution ahead: teachers, vetting and the law",
abstract = "At the beginning of 2006 the media reported instances where people who had been convicted of sexual offences against children were permitted to work in schools. A list of unsuitable people (known as {\textquoteleft}List 99{\textquoteright}) has existed for over 80 years and yet the system appears to have broken down. In this article I seek to examine some of the issues involved in the operation of List 99, including the suggestion that those who are cautioned for committing offences against children should equally be unable to work with children. A second article will then critically analyse the changes proposed by the government to the operation of List 99 and the vetting of those who wish to work with children.",
author = "Alisdair Gillespie",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/09539960600720516",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "19--30",
journal = "Education and the Law",
issn = "0953-9964",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caution ahead

T2 - teachers, vetting and the law

AU - Gillespie, Alisdair

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - At the beginning of 2006 the media reported instances where people who had been convicted of sexual offences against children were permitted to work in schools. A list of unsuitable people (known as ‘List 99’) has existed for over 80 years and yet the system appears to have broken down. In this article I seek to examine some of the issues involved in the operation of List 99, including the suggestion that those who are cautioned for committing offences against children should equally be unable to work with children. A second article will then critically analyse the changes proposed by the government to the operation of List 99 and the vetting of those who wish to work with children.

AB - At the beginning of 2006 the media reported instances where people who had been convicted of sexual offences against children were permitted to work in schools. A list of unsuitable people (known as ‘List 99’) has existed for over 80 years and yet the system appears to have broken down. In this article I seek to examine some of the issues involved in the operation of List 99, including the suggestion that those who are cautioned for committing offences against children should equally be unable to work with children. A second article will then critically analyse the changes proposed by the government to the operation of List 99 and the vetting of those who wish to work with children.

U2 - 10.1080/09539960600720516

DO - 10.1080/09539960600720516

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 19

EP - 30

JO - Education and the Law

JF - Education and the Law

SN - 0953-9964

IS - 1

ER -