Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Characterization of surface damage via surface ...
View graph of relations

Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves. / Warren, P. D. ; Pecorari, C. ; Kolosov, Oleg et al.
In: Nanotechnology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 09.1996, p. 295-301.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Warren, PD, Pecorari, C, Kolosov, O, Roberts, SG & Briggs, GAD 1996, 'Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves', Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020

APA

Warren, P. D., Pecorari, C., Kolosov, O., Roberts, S. G., & Briggs, G. A. D. (1996). Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves. Nanotechnology, 7(3), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020

Vancouver

Warren PD, Pecorari C, Kolosov O, Roberts SG, Briggs GAD. Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves. Nanotechnology. 1996 Sept;7(3):295-301. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020

Author

Warren, P. D. ; Pecorari, C. ; Kolosov, Oleg et al. / Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves. In: Nanotechnology. 1996 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 295-301.

Bibtex

@article{98eb3f673a73418bb48e7bdad421df2b,
title = "Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves",
abstract = "The damage introduced by polishing and machining of brittle materials has been evaluated by two techniques: quantitative acoustic microscopy (QAM) and surface Brillouin scattering (SBS), Both methods rely on the generation and detection of surface acoustic waves (SAW), also known as Rayleigh waves. The difference between the two techniques lies in the frequency of the wave generated and hence in the depth of the near-surface region sampled. Results are presented for (i) GaAs samples, polished using a variety of chemical and chemo-mechanical treatments, (ii) float-glass specimens with different levels of tin-contamination in either side, and (iii) alumina samples that have been variously ground and polished. It is shown that both BS and QAM can be used to evaluate the state of damage in a surface and that the varying contributions to the differences in SAW velocity between damaged and undamaged surfaces (viz surface roughness, surface microcracking and residual stresses) can be quantitatively modelled.",
author = "Warren, {P. D.} and C. Pecorari and Oleg Kolosov and Roberts, {S. G.} and Briggs, {G. A. D.}",
year = "1996",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "295--301",
journal = "Nanotechnology",
issn = "0957-4484",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of surface damage via surface acoustic waves

AU - Warren, P. D.

AU - Pecorari, C.

AU - Kolosov, Oleg

AU - Roberts, S. G.

AU - Briggs, G. A. D.

PY - 1996/9

Y1 - 1996/9

N2 - The damage introduced by polishing and machining of brittle materials has been evaluated by two techniques: quantitative acoustic microscopy (QAM) and surface Brillouin scattering (SBS), Both methods rely on the generation and detection of surface acoustic waves (SAW), also known as Rayleigh waves. The difference between the two techniques lies in the frequency of the wave generated and hence in the depth of the near-surface region sampled. Results are presented for (i) GaAs samples, polished using a variety of chemical and chemo-mechanical treatments, (ii) float-glass specimens with different levels of tin-contamination in either side, and (iii) alumina samples that have been variously ground and polished. It is shown that both BS and QAM can be used to evaluate the state of damage in a surface and that the varying contributions to the differences in SAW velocity between damaged and undamaged surfaces (viz surface roughness, surface microcracking and residual stresses) can be quantitatively modelled.

AB - The damage introduced by polishing and machining of brittle materials has been evaluated by two techniques: quantitative acoustic microscopy (QAM) and surface Brillouin scattering (SBS), Both methods rely on the generation and detection of surface acoustic waves (SAW), also known as Rayleigh waves. The difference between the two techniques lies in the frequency of the wave generated and hence in the depth of the near-surface region sampled. Results are presented for (i) GaAs samples, polished using a variety of chemical and chemo-mechanical treatments, (ii) float-glass specimens with different levels of tin-contamination in either side, and (iii) alumina samples that have been variously ground and polished. It is shown that both BS and QAM can be used to evaluate the state of damage in a surface and that the varying contributions to the differences in SAW velocity between damaged and undamaged surfaces (viz surface roughness, surface microcracking and residual stresses) can be quantitatively modelled.

U2 - 10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020

DO - 10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 295

EP - 301

JO - Nanotechnology

JF - Nanotechnology

SN - 0957-4484

IS - 3

ER -