Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Children's processing and comprehension of comp...

Electronic data

  • PROCESSING_SENTENCES_CONTAINING_TEMPORAL_CONNECTIVES_JUNE_22 (1)

    Rights statement: © 2016 American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

    Accepted author manuscript, 717 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Children's processing and comprehension of complex sentences containing temporal connectives: the influence of memory on the time course of accurate responses

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/10/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Developmental Psychology
Issue number10
Volume52
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)1517-1529
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In a touch screen paradigm, we recorded 3- to 7-year-olds’ (N = 108) accuracy and response times to assess their comprehension of two-clause sentences containing before and after. Children were influenced by order: performance was most accurate when the presentation order of the two clauses matched the chronological order of events: ‘She drank the juice, before she walked in the park’ (chronological order) vs ‘Before she walked in the park, she drank the juice’ (reverse order). Differences in response times for correct responses varied by sentence type: accurate responses were made more speedily for sentences that afforded an incremental processing of meaning. An independent measure of memory predicted this pattern of performance. We discuss these findings in relation to children’s knowledge of connective meaning and the processing requirements of sentences containing temporal connectives.

Bibliographic note

© 2016 American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.