Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for ...
View graph of relations

Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case. / Kopela, Sophia.
In: Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 11.2011, p. 313-324.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Kopela, S 2011, 'Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case', Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00732.x

APA

Vancouver

Kopela S. Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 2011 Nov;20(3):313-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00732.x

Author

Kopela, Sophia. / Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case. In: Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 313-324.

Bibtex

@article{d7adafeeb1a34eaf9cfc3626e1dc5d75,
title = "Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case",
abstract = "An efficient international system for the prevention of oil marine pollution is dependent upon the provision of effective deterrence mechanisms. Effective and adequately severe sanctions should be part of this system. Growing concerns regarding accidents causing extensive oil marine pollution have led to criticism regarding the lack of a deterrence effect for the international civil liability regime. French criminal courts in the Erika case have interpreted the international civil and criminal liability regimes in a radical, though inspiring, way. This article analyzes the approach of the French courts with regard to criminal liability for oil marine pollution, channelling of civil liability and claims for environmental damage per se. It concludes by identifying the impact of these judgments on the future of the international liability regimes for oil pollution damage, especially considering their role as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution",
author = "Sophia Kopela",
year = "2011",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00732.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "313--324",
journal = "Review of European Community and International Environmental Law",
issn = "1467-9388",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civil and criminal liability as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution : the Erika case

AU - Kopela, Sophia

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - An efficient international system for the prevention of oil marine pollution is dependent upon the provision of effective deterrence mechanisms. Effective and adequately severe sanctions should be part of this system. Growing concerns regarding accidents causing extensive oil marine pollution have led to criticism regarding the lack of a deterrence effect for the international civil liability regime. French criminal courts in the Erika case have interpreted the international civil and criminal liability regimes in a radical, though inspiring, way. This article analyzes the approach of the French courts with regard to criminal liability for oil marine pollution, channelling of civil liability and claims for environmental damage per se. It concludes by identifying the impact of these judgments on the future of the international liability regimes for oil pollution damage, especially considering their role as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution

AB - An efficient international system for the prevention of oil marine pollution is dependent upon the provision of effective deterrence mechanisms. Effective and adequately severe sanctions should be part of this system. Growing concerns regarding accidents causing extensive oil marine pollution have led to criticism regarding the lack of a deterrence effect for the international civil liability regime. French criminal courts in the Erika case have interpreted the international civil and criminal liability regimes in a radical, though inspiring, way. This article analyzes the approach of the French courts with regard to criminal liability for oil marine pollution, channelling of civil liability and claims for environmental damage per se. It concludes by identifying the impact of these judgments on the future of the international liability regimes for oil pollution damage, especially considering their role as mechanisms for the prevention of oil marine pollution

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00732.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00732.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 313

EP - 324

JO - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

JF - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

SN - 1467-9388

IS - 3

ER -