Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.
View graph of relations

Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paper

Unpublished

Standard

Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’. / Venn, Edward.
2004. Paper presented at SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process', University of Surrey.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paper

Harvard

Venn, E 2004, 'Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.', Paper presented at SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process', University of Surrey, 29/03/04.

APA

Venn, E. (2004). Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.. Paper presented at SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process', University of Surrey.

Vancouver

Venn E. Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.. 2004. Paper presented at SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process', University of Surrey.

Author

Venn, Edward. / Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’. Paper presented at SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process', University of Surrey.

Bibtex

@conference{990ed148ea2c4156b7e5ef2cddc20d5f,
title = "Codes, Invention and a {\textquoteleft}Freaky, Funky Rave{\textquoteright}.",
abstract = "In his book {"}The Limits of Interpretation{"} (1990), Umberto Eco draws on his ongoing concerns relating to coding, repetition and invention (see especially Eco 1976, 1979 and 1984) to frame his discussion of the {\textquoteleft}modern{\textquoteright} dialectic between {\textquoteleft}order and innovation{\textquoteright}. Despite the assertion that {\textquoteleft}the limitations of interpretation coincide with the rights of the text{\textquoteright}, the notion of an authorial voice, whilst not central to his theory, is by no means incommensurate. In a piece such as the third movement of Thomas Ad{\`e}s{\textquoteright}s {"}Asyla{"} (Ecstasio), in which a late twentieth-century response to the symphonic tradition is combined, contrasted and juxtaposed with gestures and figurations drawn from contemporary club music, there exists a particularly complex interplay between conventional coding and novelty. In this paper I will demonstrate how Eco{\textquoteright}s concept of {\textquoteleft}order and innovation{\textquoteright}, when understood in the wider context of his general semiotic theory, can be used to ground an analysis of a work such as Ecstasio, highlighting some of the multiple (cultural) meanings that Ad{\`e}s invokes (intentionally or otherwise).",
author = "Edward Venn",
year = "2004",
month = mar,
day = "29",
language = "English",
note = "SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process' ; Conference date: 29-03-2004",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Codes, Invention and a ‘Freaky, Funky Rave’.

AU - Venn, Edward

PY - 2004/3/29

Y1 - 2004/3/29

N2 - In his book "The Limits of Interpretation" (1990), Umberto Eco draws on his ongoing concerns relating to coding, repetition and invention (see especially Eco 1976, 1979 and 1984) to frame his discussion of the ‘modern’ dialectic between ‘order and innovation’. Despite the assertion that ‘the limitations of interpretation coincide with the rights of the text’, the notion of an authorial voice, whilst not central to his theory, is by no means incommensurate. In a piece such as the third movement of Thomas Adès’s "Asyla" (Ecstasio), in which a late twentieth-century response to the symphonic tradition is combined, contrasted and juxtaposed with gestures and figurations drawn from contemporary club music, there exists a particularly complex interplay between conventional coding and novelty. In this paper I will demonstrate how Eco’s concept of ‘order and innovation’, when understood in the wider context of his general semiotic theory, can be used to ground an analysis of a work such as Ecstasio, highlighting some of the multiple (cultural) meanings that Adès invokes (intentionally or otherwise).

AB - In his book "The Limits of Interpretation" (1990), Umberto Eco draws on his ongoing concerns relating to coding, repetition and invention (see especially Eco 1976, 1979 and 1984) to frame his discussion of the ‘modern’ dialectic between ‘order and innovation’. Despite the assertion that ‘the limitations of interpretation coincide with the rights of the text’, the notion of an authorial voice, whilst not central to his theory, is by no means incommensurate. In a piece such as the third movement of Thomas Adès’s "Asyla" (Ecstasio), in which a late twentieth-century response to the symphonic tradition is combined, contrasted and juxtaposed with gestures and figurations drawn from contemporary club music, there exists a particularly complex interplay between conventional coding and novelty. In this paper I will demonstrate how Eco’s concept of ‘order and innovation’, when understood in the wider context of his general semiotic theory, can be used to ground an analysis of a work such as Ecstasio, highlighting some of the multiple (cultural) meanings that Adès invokes (intentionally or otherwise).

M3 - Conference paper

T2 - SMA/RMA Study Day, 'Analysis and Compositional Process'

Y2 - 29 March 2004

ER -