TY - JOUR

T1 - Cohousing Professionals as 'Middle-Agents'

T2 - Perspectives from the UK, USA and the Netherlands

AU - Fernandez Arrigoitia, Melissa

AU - Tummers, Lidewij

N1 - © Arrigoitia et al., 2019. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Built Environment, 45, 3, 346-363, 2019, 10.2148/benv.45.3.346

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - This article explores the role of cohousing professionals in three countries (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States) where the relevance of this form of collaborative dwelling has grown. Cohousing initiators everywhere have to hire technical consultants such as financial and legal advisers and traditional project managers. These 'experts' or 'professionals' may, however, be insufficiently equipped to deal with the development particularities of cohousing which require the ability to move between, and translate, knowledge of different kinds. In response to this, a new type of cohousing specialist such as group-facilitators, process-management and legal coop-specialists is emerging, but the specificity and implications of their roles has gone largely unstudied. Drawing on interviews and fieldwork across the three countries, we explore the roles and dynamics, as well as the paradoxes faced by this varied professional sector. We argue that professionals are 'middle agents' who must negotiate their way between niche and mainstream housing landscapes, and that cohousing professionalization is taking place in a way that can potentially transform both grassroots and mainstream housing provision. Based on this, the conclusions recommend a shift in higher education and specialist training.

AB - This article explores the role of cohousing professionals in three countries (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States) where the relevance of this form of collaborative dwelling has grown. Cohousing initiators everywhere have to hire technical consultants such as financial and legal advisers and traditional project managers. These 'experts' or 'professionals' may, however, be insufficiently equipped to deal with the development particularities of cohousing which require the ability to move between, and translate, knowledge of different kinds. In response to this, a new type of cohousing specialist such as group-facilitators, process-management and legal coop-specialists is emerging, but the specificity and implications of their roles has gone largely unstudied. Drawing on interviews and fieldwork across the three countries, we explore the roles and dynamics, as well as the paradoxes faced by this varied professional sector. We argue that professionals are 'middle agents' who must negotiate their way between niche and mainstream housing landscapes, and that cohousing professionalization is taking place in a way that can potentially transform both grassroots and mainstream housing provision. Based on this, the conclusions recommend a shift in higher education and specialist training.

KW - cohousing

KW - consultants

KW - institutionalization

KW - middle agents

KW - professionals

U2 - 10.2148/benv.45.3.346

DO - 10.2148/benv.45.3.346

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 346

EP - 363

JO - Built Environment

JF - Built Environment

SN - 0263-7960

IS - 3

ER -