Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comment on "Inference with minimal Gibbs free e...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comment on "Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory"

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Published

Standard

Comment on "Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory". / Iatsenko, D.; Stefanovska, A.; McClintock, P. V. E.
In: Physical Review E, Vol. 85, No. 3, 033101, 20.03.2012, p. -.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Iatsenko D, Stefanovska A, McClintock PVE. Comment on "Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory". Physical Review E. 2012 Mar 20;85(3):-. 033101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.033101

Author

Bibtex

@article{441a301103604538969bd688b5f3df58,
title = "Comment on {"}Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory{"}",
abstract = "Ensslin and Weig [Phys. Rev. E 82, 051112 (2010)] have introduced a {"}minimum Gibbs free energy{"} (MGFE) approach for estimation of the mean signal and signal uncertainty in Bayesian inference problems: it aims to combine the maximum a posteriori (MAP) and maximum entropy (ME) principles. We point out, however, that there are some important questions to be clarified before the new approach can be considered fully justified, and therefore able to be used with confidence. In particular, after obtaining a Gaussian approximation to the posterior in terms of the MGFE at some temperature T, this approximation should always be raised to the power of T to yield a reliable estimate. In addition, we show explicitly that MGFE indeed incorporates the MAP principle, as well as the MDI (minimum discrimination information) approach, but not the well-known ME principle of Jaynes [E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)]. We also illuminate some related issues and resolve apparent discrepancies. Finally, we investigate the performance of MGFE estimation for different values of T, and we discuss the advantages and shortcomings of the approach.",
author = "D. Iatsenko and A. Stefanovska and McClintock, {P. V. E.}",
note = "{\textcopyright}2012 American Physical Society",
year = "2012",
month = mar,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.85.033101",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "--",
journal = "Physical Review E",
issn = "1539-3755",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on "Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory"

AU - Iatsenko, D.

AU - Stefanovska, A.

AU - McClintock, P. V. E.

N1 - ©2012 American Physical Society

PY - 2012/3/20

Y1 - 2012/3/20

N2 - Ensslin and Weig [Phys. Rev. E 82, 051112 (2010)] have introduced a "minimum Gibbs free energy" (MGFE) approach for estimation of the mean signal and signal uncertainty in Bayesian inference problems: it aims to combine the maximum a posteriori (MAP) and maximum entropy (ME) principles. We point out, however, that there are some important questions to be clarified before the new approach can be considered fully justified, and therefore able to be used with confidence. In particular, after obtaining a Gaussian approximation to the posterior in terms of the MGFE at some temperature T, this approximation should always be raised to the power of T to yield a reliable estimate. In addition, we show explicitly that MGFE indeed incorporates the MAP principle, as well as the MDI (minimum discrimination information) approach, but not the well-known ME principle of Jaynes [E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)]. We also illuminate some related issues and resolve apparent discrepancies. Finally, we investigate the performance of MGFE estimation for different values of T, and we discuss the advantages and shortcomings of the approach.

AB - Ensslin and Weig [Phys. Rev. E 82, 051112 (2010)] have introduced a "minimum Gibbs free energy" (MGFE) approach for estimation of the mean signal and signal uncertainty in Bayesian inference problems: it aims to combine the maximum a posteriori (MAP) and maximum entropy (ME) principles. We point out, however, that there are some important questions to be clarified before the new approach can be considered fully justified, and therefore able to be used with confidence. In particular, after obtaining a Gaussian approximation to the posterior in terms of the MGFE at some temperature T, this approximation should always be raised to the power of T to yield a reliable estimate. In addition, we show explicitly that MGFE indeed incorporates the MAP principle, as well as the MDI (minimum discrimination information) approach, but not the well-known ME principle of Jaynes [E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)]. We also illuminate some related issues and resolve apparent discrepancies. Finally, we investigate the performance of MGFE estimation for different values of T, and we discuss the advantages and shortcomings of the approach.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.033101

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.033101

M3 - Editorial

VL - 85

SP - -

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

SN - 1539-3755

IS - 3

M1 - 033101

ER -