Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organ...
View graph of relations

Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organisational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda”

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debatepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organisational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda”. / Araujo, Luis.
In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 65, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 277-278.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debatepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Araujo L. Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organisational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda”. Journal of Business Research. 2012 Feb;65(2):277-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.031

Author

Bibtex

@article{7d55c07d37a04df4a8121c5418e75f70,
title = "Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organisational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda”",
abstract = "This commentary discusses the article by Baraldi, Gressetvold and Harrison (this issue), which reviews the foundations and implications of the resource interaction perspective. The discussion stresses the Penrosean legacy of this perspective but also its potential to expand the Penrosean framework beyond intraorganisational applications, that is, to an understanding of markets and networks.",
author = "Luis Araujo",
year = "2012",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.031",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "277--278",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on “Resource interaction in inter-organisational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda”

AU - Araujo, Luis

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - This commentary discusses the article by Baraldi, Gressetvold and Harrison (this issue), which reviews the foundations and implications of the resource interaction perspective. The discussion stresses the Penrosean legacy of this perspective but also its potential to expand the Penrosean framework beyond intraorganisational applications, that is, to an understanding of markets and networks.

AB - This commentary discusses the article by Baraldi, Gressetvold and Harrison (this issue), which reviews the foundations and implications of the resource interaction perspective. The discussion stresses the Penrosean legacy of this perspective but also its potential to expand the Penrosean framework beyond intraorganisational applications, that is, to an understanding of markets and networks.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.031

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 65

SP - 277

EP - 278

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 2

ER -