Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and for...
View graph of relations

Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction. / Myers, Greg.
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.04.2007, p. 285-305.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Myers G. Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction. Journal of Risk Research. 2007 Apr 1;10(3):285-305.

Author

Myers, Greg. / Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2007 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 285-305.

Bibtex

@article{7c359dc1bbfd40f7a1e4bac6c487229a,
title = "Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction.",
abstract = "Talk about risk is problematic for interaction; it can involve the speaker or hearer saying things that threaten participants' 'face', the ways they want themselves to be seen by others. One way of dealing with these threats to face, and to keep the conversation going, is the use of commonplaces. Commonplaces, generally applicable and generally known arguments, play an important role in interaction, invoking shared, taken-for-granted perspectives embedded in familiar roles and everyday practices. They are similar to some of the frames discussed in risk communication, but they focus our attention on rhetoric and interaction rather than cognition. In this paper, I show how commonplaces are used in focus group discussions of public choices involving dangers to life or health. They tend to be used in response to dilemmas, when a speaker is put on the spot, and they tend to lead to other commonplaces. Analysis of commonplaces supports those who argue that studies of public perception of risks and programmes of communication about risks need to be sensitive to the personal interactions, rhetorical strategies, and cultural embeddedness of any risk talk.",
keywords = "risk, discourse analysis, focus groups, rhetoric",
author = "Greg Myers",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Linguistics",
year = "2007",
month = apr,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "285--305",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1466-4461",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commonplaces in risk talk: Face threats and forms of interaction.

AU - Myers, Greg

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Linguistics

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Talk about risk is problematic for interaction; it can involve the speaker or hearer saying things that threaten participants' 'face', the ways they want themselves to be seen by others. One way of dealing with these threats to face, and to keep the conversation going, is the use of commonplaces. Commonplaces, generally applicable and generally known arguments, play an important role in interaction, invoking shared, taken-for-granted perspectives embedded in familiar roles and everyday practices. They are similar to some of the frames discussed in risk communication, but they focus our attention on rhetoric and interaction rather than cognition. In this paper, I show how commonplaces are used in focus group discussions of public choices involving dangers to life or health. They tend to be used in response to dilemmas, when a speaker is put on the spot, and they tend to lead to other commonplaces. Analysis of commonplaces supports those who argue that studies of public perception of risks and programmes of communication about risks need to be sensitive to the personal interactions, rhetorical strategies, and cultural embeddedness of any risk talk.

AB - Talk about risk is problematic for interaction; it can involve the speaker or hearer saying things that threaten participants' 'face', the ways they want themselves to be seen by others. One way of dealing with these threats to face, and to keep the conversation going, is the use of commonplaces. Commonplaces, generally applicable and generally known arguments, play an important role in interaction, invoking shared, taken-for-granted perspectives embedded in familiar roles and everyday practices. They are similar to some of the frames discussed in risk communication, but they focus our attention on rhetoric and interaction rather than cognition. In this paper, I show how commonplaces are used in focus group discussions of public choices involving dangers to life or health. They tend to be used in response to dilemmas, when a speaker is put on the spot, and they tend to lead to other commonplaces. Analysis of commonplaces supports those who argue that studies of public perception of risks and programmes of communication about risks need to be sensitive to the personal interactions, rhetorical strategies, and cultural embeddedness of any risk talk.

KW - risk

KW - discourse analysis

KW - focus groups

KW - rhetoric

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 285

EP - 305

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1466-4461

IS - 3

ER -