Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Communicative rationality in the clinic?

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Communicative rationality in the clinic?: exploring the parental role in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Communicative rationality in the clinic? exploring the parental role in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. / Hodge, Suzanne; Perkins, Elizabeth.
In: Social Theory and Health, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2007, p. 107-125.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hodge S, Perkins E. Communicative rationality in the clinic? exploring the parental role in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. Social Theory and Health. 2007;5(2):107-125. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700093

Author

Bibtex

@article{9ca9e6aadf8f43699cbebb525e86830f,
title = "Communicative rationality in the clinic?: exploring the parental role in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children",
abstract = "This paper explores the role of parents of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux in managing their children's health. It draws on the findings of a qualitative study that looked at the way in which treatment decisions are made in a joint surgical-medical clinic and which showed that the parents of children referred to the clinic play a crucial role in the development and execution of treatment plans. Using Habermas's theory of communicative action, we show how the parents develop an in-depth understanding of the condition and its treatments, combining 'objective world' medical knowledge, 'social world' norms and understandings and 'subjective world' experiential knowledge. We argue that in engaging with different forms of knowledge and with the treatment decisions made in the clinic the parents reason and act in a more or less communicatively rational way. The model of the joint clinic enhances the potential for communicative rationality to develop through its more than usually dialogical approach to decision-making that places emphasis on the parents' expertise and incorporates it into the development of treatment plans. As might be anticipated, however, the clinic also provides much evidence of strategic rationality at work, on the part of both clinicians and parents.",
keywords = "Habermas, gastro-oesophageal reflux, doctor–patient interactions, decision-making, theory of communicative action",
author = "Suzanne Hodge and Elizabeth Perkins",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700093",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "107--125",
journal = "Social Theory and Health",
issn = "1477-8211",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicative rationality in the clinic?

T2 - exploring the parental role in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children

AU - Hodge, Suzanne

AU - Perkins, Elizabeth

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper explores the role of parents of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux in managing their children's health. It draws on the findings of a qualitative study that looked at the way in which treatment decisions are made in a joint surgical-medical clinic and which showed that the parents of children referred to the clinic play a crucial role in the development and execution of treatment plans. Using Habermas's theory of communicative action, we show how the parents develop an in-depth understanding of the condition and its treatments, combining 'objective world' medical knowledge, 'social world' norms and understandings and 'subjective world' experiential knowledge. We argue that in engaging with different forms of knowledge and with the treatment decisions made in the clinic the parents reason and act in a more or less communicatively rational way. The model of the joint clinic enhances the potential for communicative rationality to develop through its more than usually dialogical approach to decision-making that places emphasis on the parents' expertise and incorporates it into the development of treatment plans. As might be anticipated, however, the clinic also provides much evidence of strategic rationality at work, on the part of both clinicians and parents.

AB - This paper explores the role of parents of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux in managing their children's health. It draws on the findings of a qualitative study that looked at the way in which treatment decisions are made in a joint surgical-medical clinic and which showed that the parents of children referred to the clinic play a crucial role in the development and execution of treatment plans. Using Habermas's theory of communicative action, we show how the parents develop an in-depth understanding of the condition and its treatments, combining 'objective world' medical knowledge, 'social world' norms and understandings and 'subjective world' experiential knowledge. We argue that in engaging with different forms of knowledge and with the treatment decisions made in the clinic the parents reason and act in a more or less communicatively rational way. The model of the joint clinic enhances the potential for communicative rationality to develop through its more than usually dialogical approach to decision-making that places emphasis on the parents' expertise and incorporates it into the development of treatment plans. As might be anticipated, however, the clinic also provides much evidence of strategic rationality at work, on the part of both clinicians and parents.

KW - Habermas

KW - gastro-oesophageal reflux

KW - doctor–patient interactions

KW - decision-making

KW - theory of communicative action

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700093

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700093

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 107

EP - 125

JO - Social Theory and Health

JF - Social Theory and Health

SN - 1477-8211

IS - 2

ER -