Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparative net energy analysis of renewable el...

Electronic data

  • 5890_4_art_0_pnk0xh

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 8/10/19

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparative net energy analysis of renewable electricity and carbon capture and storage

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Sgouris Sgouridis
  • Michael Carbajales-Dale
  • Denes Csala
  • Matteo Chiesa
  • Ugo Bardi
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>8/04/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Nature Energy
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for fossil-fuel power plants is perceived as a critical technology for climate mitigation. Nevertheless, limited installed capacity to date raises concerns about the ability of CCS to scale sufficiently. Conversely, scalable renewable electricity installations—solar and wind—are already deployed at scale and have demonstrated a rapid expansion potential. Here we show that power-sector CO2 emission reductions accomplished by investing in renewable technologies generally provide a better energetic return than CCS. We estimate the electrical energy return on energy invested ratio of CCS projects, accounting for their operational and infrastructural energy penalties, to range between 6.6:1 and 21.3:1 for 90% capture ratio and 85% capacity factor. These values compare unfavourably with dispatchable scalable renewable electricity with storage, which ranges from 9:1 to 30+:1 under realistic configurations. Therefore, renewables plus storage provide a more energetically effective approach to climate mitigation than constructing CCS fossil-fuel power stations.