Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparing China and India's disputed borderland...

Electronic data

  • COMPARING CHINA AND INDIA

    Accepted author manuscript, 299 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparing China and India's disputed borderland regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Comparing China and India's disputed borderland regions : Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. / Mukherjee, Kunal.

In: East Asia: An International Quarterly , Vol. 32, No. 2, 2015, p. 173-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Mukherjee, Kunal. / Comparing China and India's disputed borderland regions : Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. In: East Asia: An International Quarterly . 2015 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 173-205.

Bibtex

@article{8798c46db710483e8e6e539f116c5023,
title = "Comparing China and India's disputed borderland regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast",
abstract = "The paper tries to make an assessment of the borderland regions of China and India with a focus on Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. The paper looks at the conflict in India and China's periphery, how these conflicts have evolved with time and how they have changed their character with the passage of time, from the 1950s until the present day. After looking at some background, the paper primarily focusses on three key issues which impact on all four of the conflicts: the rise of ethnic nationalism, the impact of external forces on the conflict and the human rights situation. After making an assessment of the political situation, the paper looks at the areas of similarity and differences between the four regions. Methodologically, a bottom-up approach was taken and in-depth unstructured interviews were carried out with people from the conflict zones that the paper considers.",
author = "Kunal Mukherjee",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "173--205",
journal = "East Asia: An International Quarterly ",
issn = "1096-6838",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing China and India's disputed borderland regions

T2 - Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast

AU - Mukherjee, Kunal

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The paper tries to make an assessment of the borderland regions of China and India with a focus on Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. The paper looks at the conflict in India and China's periphery, how these conflicts have evolved with time and how they have changed their character with the passage of time, from the 1950s until the present day. After looking at some background, the paper primarily focusses on three key issues which impact on all four of the conflicts: the rise of ethnic nationalism, the impact of external forces on the conflict and the human rights situation. After making an assessment of the political situation, the paper looks at the areas of similarity and differences between the four regions. Methodologically, a bottom-up approach was taken and in-depth unstructured interviews were carried out with people from the conflict zones that the paper considers.

AB - The paper tries to make an assessment of the borderland regions of China and India with a focus on Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. The paper looks at the conflict in India and China's periphery, how these conflicts have evolved with time and how they have changed their character with the passage of time, from the 1950s until the present day. After looking at some background, the paper primarily focusses on three key issues which impact on all four of the conflicts: the rise of ethnic nationalism, the impact of external forces on the conflict and the human rights situation. After making an assessment of the political situation, the paper looks at the areas of similarity and differences between the four regions. Methodologically, a bottom-up approach was taken and in-depth unstructured interviews were carried out with people from the conflict zones that the paper considers.

U2 - 10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9

DO - 10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 173

EP - 205

JO - East Asia: An International Quarterly

JF - East Asia: An International Quarterly

SN - 1096-6838

IS - 2

ER -