Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparing India's disputed borderlands
View graph of relations

Comparing India's disputed borderlands: Kashmir and the Northeast

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparing India's disputed borderlands: Kashmir and the Northeast. / Mukherjee, Kunal.
In: Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, Vol. 18, No. 1, 06.2014, p. 31-61.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mukherjee, K 2014, 'Comparing India's disputed borderlands: Kashmir and the Northeast', Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598414552749

APA

Vancouver

Mukherjee K. Comparing India's disputed borderlands: Kashmir and the Northeast. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations. 2014 Jun;18(1):31-61. doi: 10.1177/0973598414552749

Author

Mukherjee, Kunal. / Comparing India's disputed borderlands : Kashmir and the Northeast. In: Jadavpur Journal of International Relations. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 31-61.

Bibtex

@article{760ecf1f01534fed957dccdfc483ba22,
title = "Comparing India's disputed borderlands: Kashmir and the Northeast",
abstract = "This article attempts a comparative study of India{\textquoteright}s troubled borderlands, that is, Kashmir and the Northeast region. Both the regions are marked by geographical isolation, insurgent/secessionist movements, heavy militarization and external intervention. Yet, the situation in the Northeast is more complex because of its prodigious cultural diversity and heterogeneity, and as a result, conflicts exist at many different levels. However, the ethnic scenario in Kashmir is compounded by Pakistani irredentism and the presence of Hindu nationalism and communalism. These similarities and differences have been explored in terms of four factors: the rise of ethnic nationalism; the role played by external actors; the impact of globalization; and the human rights situation in the respective region. The article concludes with some recommendations for improvement of the situation on the ground",
keywords = "India, borderlands, Kashmir, Northeast, conflict",
author = "Kunal Mukherjee",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/0973598414552749",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "31--61",
journal = "Jadavpur Journal of International Relations",
issn = "2349-0047",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing India's disputed borderlands

T2 - Kashmir and the Northeast

AU - Mukherjee, Kunal

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - This article attempts a comparative study of India’s troubled borderlands, that is, Kashmir and the Northeast region. Both the regions are marked by geographical isolation, insurgent/secessionist movements, heavy militarization and external intervention. Yet, the situation in the Northeast is more complex because of its prodigious cultural diversity and heterogeneity, and as a result, conflicts exist at many different levels. However, the ethnic scenario in Kashmir is compounded by Pakistani irredentism and the presence of Hindu nationalism and communalism. These similarities and differences have been explored in terms of four factors: the rise of ethnic nationalism; the role played by external actors; the impact of globalization; and the human rights situation in the respective region. The article concludes with some recommendations for improvement of the situation on the ground

AB - This article attempts a comparative study of India’s troubled borderlands, that is, Kashmir and the Northeast region. Both the regions are marked by geographical isolation, insurgent/secessionist movements, heavy militarization and external intervention. Yet, the situation in the Northeast is more complex because of its prodigious cultural diversity and heterogeneity, and as a result, conflicts exist at many different levels. However, the ethnic scenario in Kashmir is compounded by Pakistani irredentism and the presence of Hindu nationalism and communalism. These similarities and differences have been explored in terms of four factors: the rise of ethnic nationalism; the role played by external actors; the impact of globalization; and the human rights situation in the respective region. The article concludes with some recommendations for improvement of the situation on the ground

KW - India

KW - borderlands

KW - Kashmir

KW - Northeast

KW - conflict

U2 - 10.1177/0973598414552749

DO - 10.1177/0973598414552749

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 31

EP - 61

JO - Jadavpur Journal of International Relations

JF - Jadavpur Journal of International Relations

SN - 2349-0047

IS - 1

ER -