Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged ...
View graph of relations

Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged and unflanged acetabular cups

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article


  • Rajarshi Bhattacharya
  • Fahad G. Attar
  • Sarah Green
  • Andrew Port
Article number5
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>3/02/2012
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Issue number1
Number of pages5
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This biomechanical study examined difference in cement pressures generated by flanged and unflanged acetabular cups in hip arthroplasty.

Using a model acetabulum, cement was inserted and pressurised followed by cup insertion and pressurisation. Pressures were recorded using transducers in the acetabulum. We compared Charnley Ogee (flanged), Exeter contemporary (flanged) and Exeter low profile (unflanged) cups using Simplex and CMW1 cements in turn.

Using Simplex, Charnley Ogee cup generated highest initial peak pressure and overall mean pressure. Exeter unflanged cup generated higher initial and mean pressures compared to Exeter flanged cup. With CMW, there was no significant difference between the pressures generated by the cups.

Our experiment suggests that flanged cups do not consistently generate significantly higher cement pressures compared to unflanged cups.


Bibliographic note

© 2012 Bhattacharya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.