Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conceptuality in question : teaching and cognit...
View graph of relations

Conceptuality in question : teaching and cognition in Yogacara-Madhymaka.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Conceptuality in question : teaching and cognition in Yogacara-Madhymaka. / Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi.
In: Religious Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 09.2000, p. 277-291.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{9ce3e4420d8c434ea448e6e30125c1a7,
title = "Conceptuality in question : teaching and cognition in Yogacara-Madhymaka.",
abstract = "For Yogacara-Madhyamaka, enlightenment is free of the mistaken conceptual construction of subject and objects of desire. The Buddha's awakening was a state purified of concepts, without desire and suffering. But, subsequently, he compassionately taught of awakening, and teaching is conceptual. Can enlightenment be both cognitively pure and concept-utilizing? To secure cognitive purity while teaching, the philosophers argue that the enlightened person is cleansed of desire for subject and objects, rather than strictly free of concepts of subject and objects. To secure teaching after the attainment of pure cognition, they allow conceptuality, so long as it is free of desire.",
keywords = "http, //journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RES The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Religious Studies, 36 (3), pp 277-291 2000, {\textcopyright} 2000 Cambridge University Press.",
author = "Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad",
year = "2000",
month = sep,
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "277--291",
journal = "Religious Studies",
issn = "1465-901X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptuality in question : teaching and cognition in Yogacara-Madhymaka.

AU - Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - For Yogacara-Madhyamaka, enlightenment is free of the mistaken conceptual construction of subject and objects of desire. The Buddha's awakening was a state purified of concepts, without desire and suffering. But, subsequently, he compassionately taught of awakening, and teaching is conceptual. Can enlightenment be both cognitively pure and concept-utilizing? To secure cognitive purity while teaching, the philosophers argue that the enlightened person is cleansed of desire for subject and objects, rather than strictly free of concepts of subject and objects. To secure teaching after the attainment of pure cognition, they allow conceptuality, so long as it is free of desire.

AB - For Yogacara-Madhyamaka, enlightenment is free of the mistaken conceptual construction of subject and objects of desire. The Buddha's awakening was a state purified of concepts, without desire and suffering. But, subsequently, he compassionately taught of awakening, and teaching is conceptual. Can enlightenment be both cognitively pure and concept-utilizing? To secure cognitive purity while teaching, the philosophers argue that the enlightened person is cleansed of desire for subject and objects, rather than strictly free of concepts of subject and objects. To secure teaching after the attainment of pure cognition, they allow conceptuality, so long as it is free of desire.

KW - http

KW - //journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RES The final

KW - definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal

KW - Religious Studies

KW - 36 (3)

KW - pp 277-291 2000

KW - © 2000 Cambridge University Press.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 277

EP - 291

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

SN - 1465-901X

IS - 3

ER -