We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK


97% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conceptualizing the authority of the sovereign ...
View graph of relations

« Back

Conceptualizing the authority of the sovereign state over indigenous peoples

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article


<mark>Journal publication date</mark>06/2014
<mark>Journal</mark>Leiden Journal of International Law
Number of pages26
Early online date8/10/13
<mark>Original language</mark>English


The objective of this article is to evaluate whether the distinctive nature of the international law on indigenous peoples reflected in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be explained by reference to the service conception of authority developed by Joseph Raz. The article rejects arguments that the distinctive character of UNDRIP can be justified by ideas of ‘Indigenous Sovereignty’, not least because ‘sovereignty’ was developed in Western political thought in contradistinction to a constructed and imagined dystopian state of nature endured by the indigenous populations of the Americas. Instead, the work seeks to understand the UNDRIP regime in the light of Raz’s conceptualization of legitimate political authority, concluding that the inchoate and under-theorized international law on the rights of indigenous peoples becomes comprehensible within this framework.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=LJL The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leiden Journal of International Law, 27 (2), pp 371-396 2014, © 2014 Cambridge University Press.