Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. / Kraemer, Romy; Whiteman, Gail; Banerjee, Bobby.
In: Organization Studies, Vol. 34, No. 5-6, 01.05.2013, p. 823-852.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kraemer R, Whiteman G, Banerjee B. Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. Organization Studies. 2013 May 1;34(5-6):823-852. doi: 10.1177/0170840613479240

Author

Kraemer, Romy ; Whiteman, Gail ; Banerjee, Bobby. / Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri : the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. In: Organization Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 5-6. pp. 823-852.

Bibtex

@article{82e8ce1e344f420fa50958139b9f73a0,
title = "Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements",
abstract = "Traditional models of transnational advocacy networks (TANs) and stakeholder management do not capture the nuance and dynamics of (counter-)organizing processes around anti-corporate mobilization. Based on the case of a resistance movement against a planned bauxite mine on tribal land in India, we develop a process theory of interactions between local, national and international actors within transnational advocacy networks. These encounters are not always friendly and are often characterized by conflict between actors with disparate goals and interests. We highlight the importance of national advocacy networks (NANs) in anti-corporate social movements and describe the conflicts and disruptions that result from ignoring them. Our findings also point to the role of corporate counter-mobilization strategies in shaping resistance movements. Our narrative revolves around a particular focal actor in the anti-mining campaign: a young tribal man who emerged as a passionate spokesperson for the movement, but later became a supporter of the controversial mine. Our findings contribute to a richer understanding of the processes underlying transnational and national anti-corporate mobilization.",
author = "Romy Kraemer and Gail Whiteman and Bobby Banerjee",
year = "2013",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0170840613479240",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "823--852",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5-6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri

T2 - the importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements

AU - Kraemer, Romy

AU - Whiteman, Gail

AU - Banerjee, Bobby

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Traditional models of transnational advocacy networks (TANs) and stakeholder management do not capture the nuance and dynamics of (counter-)organizing processes around anti-corporate mobilization. Based on the case of a resistance movement against a planned bauxite mine on tribal land in India, we develop a process theory of interactions between local, national and international actors within transnational advocacy networks. These encounters are not always friendly and are often characterized by conflict between actors with disparate goals and interests. We highlight the importance of national advocacy networks (NANs) in anti-corporate social movements and describe the conflicts and disruptions that result from ignoring them. Our findings also point to the role of corporate counter-mobilization strategies in shaping resistance movements. Our narrative revolves around a particular focal actor in the anti-mining campaign: a young tribal man who emerged as a passionate spokesperson for the movement, but later became a supporter of the controversial mine. Our findings contribute to a richer understanding of the processes underlying transnational and national anti-corporate mobilization.

AB - Traditional models of transnational advocacy networks (TANs) and stakeholder management do not capture the nuance and dynamics of (counter-)organizing processes around anti-corporate mobilization. Based on the case of a resistance movement against a planned bauxite mine on tribal land in India, we develop a process theory of interactions between local, national and international actors within transnational advocacy networks. These encounters are not always friendly and are often characterized by conflict between actors with disparate goals and interests. We highlight the importance of national advocacy networks (NANs) in anti-corporate social movements and describe the conflicts and disruptions that result from ignoring them. Our findings also point to the role of corporate counter-mobilization strategies in shaping resistance movements. Our narrative revolves around a particular focal actor in the anti-mining campaign: a young tribal man who emerged as a passionate spokesperson for the movement, but later became a supporter of the controversial mine. Our findings contribute to a richer understanding of the processes underlying transnational and national anti-corporate mobilization.

U2 - 10.1177/0170840613479240

DO - 10.1177/0170840613479240

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 823

EP - 852

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 5-6

ER -