Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conservation value of secondary forest habitats...

Electronic data

  • Accepted manuscript

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Martin, T. E. and Blackburn, G. A. (2014), Conservation value of secondary forest habitats for endemic birds, a perspective from two widely separated tropical ecosystems. Ecography, 37: 250–260. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00234.x which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00234.x/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 945 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conservation value of secondary forest habitats for endemic birds, a perspective from two widely separated tropical ecosystems

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>03/2014
<mark>Journal</mark>Ecography
Issue number3
Volume37
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)250-260
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Tropical secondary forests are increasingly widespread, but their potential for conserving endemic birds remains unclear. Previous studies report different results; however all have been restricted to geographically discreet locations. This is important as different ecosystems are influenced by different external factors, possibly influencing conservation potential. Here we use consistent survey methods to examine how endemic bird richness varies between primary and secondary forest habitats in two widely separated tropical ecosystems, providing a more global context for evaluating the conservation value of secondary forests. Research was completed in Lambusango Forest Reserve (LFR) on Buton Island, Sulawesi, and Cusuco National Park (CNP), a Honduran cloud forest reserve. Bird communities in both forests were surveyed using 50 m radius point counts. Vulnerability assessments based on ecological theory on avifaunal assemblages were then conducted, which suggested endemics in LFR to be more susceptible to disturbance than those in CNP. Contrary to the results from our vulnerability assessments, endemics in CNP were less tolerant of moderate habitat modification than those in LFR. Richness of Mesoamerican endemics per study site declined significantly between core zone forest (6.34 ± 0.81) and more degraded forest in the boundary zone (3.86 ± 0.69). Richness of Wallacean endemics was similar in primary (4.89 ± 1.68) and disturbed secondary forest (4.52 ± 1.62). We recommend considering local and regional biogeographical and ecological factors when determining the conservation value of secondary forests, and suggest examples of potential importance, including differential community richness, influence of figs and human settlement patterns.

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Martin, T. E. and Blackburn, G. A. (2014), Conservation value of secondary forest habitats for endemic birds, a perspective from two widely separated tropical ecosystems. Ecography, 37: 250–260. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00234.x which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00234.x/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.