Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Constitutionalizing multilevel governance? / Picciotto, Salomone.

In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 2008, p. 457-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Picciotto, S 2008, 'Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?', International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon017

APA

Picciotto, S. (2008). Constitutionalizing multilevel governance? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(3-4), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon017

Vancouver

Picciotto S. Constitutionalizing multilevel governance? International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2008;6(3-4):457-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon017

Author

Picciotto, Salomone. / Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 3-4. pp. 457-479.

Bibtex

@article{37ab55abe03a4d3780ae918816946d1c,
title = "Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?",
abstract = "Multilevel governance entails transformations of statehood, leading to significant changes both in the public sphere of politics and the private sphere of economic activity and in their modes of interaction, the law included. The fragmentation of the public sphere and the decentering of the state have led to new types of regulation and the emergence of global regulatory networks, thereby intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance blurs a clear hierarchy of norms and the distinctions between hard/soft and public/private law; it encourages a fragmentation of public functions. Renewed international legalization has been seen by some in formalist terms, as a way of providing some certainty and predictability; this view has been used to buttress the legitimacy of global governance Although there have been attempts to improve coordination between international regimes, they seem generally to spawn further regulatory networks; any formal constitutionalization of international regimes seems unlikely.",
keywords = "globalization law legitimacy constitution WTO tax haven",
author = "Salomone Picciotto",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/icon/mon017",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "457--479",
journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",
issn = "1474-2640",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?

AU - Picciotto, Salomone

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Multilevel governance entails transformations of statehood, leading to significant changes both in the public sphere of politics and the private sphere of economic activity and in their modes of interaction, the law included. The fragmentation of the public sphere and the decentering of the state have led to new types of regulation and the emergence of global regulatory networks, thereby intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance blurs a clear hierarchy of norms and the distinctions between hard/soft and public/private law; it encourages a fragmentation of public functions. Renewed international legalization has been seen by some in formalist terms, as a way of providing some certainty and predictability; this view has been used to buttress the legitimacy of global governance Although there have been attempts to improve coordination between international regimes, they seem generally to spawn further regulatory networks; any formal constitutionalization of international regimes seems unlikely.

AB - Multilevel governance entails transformations of statehood, leading to significant changes both in the public sphere of politics and the private sphere of economic activity and in their modes of interaction, the law included. The fragmentation of the public sphere and the decentering of the state have led to new types of regulation and the emergence of global regulatory networks, thereby intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance blurs a clear hierarchy of norms and the distinctions between hard/soft and public/private law; it encourages a fragmentation of public functions. Renewed international legalization has been seen by some in formalist terms, as a way of providing some certainty and predictability; this view has been used to buttress the legitimacy of global governance Although there have been attempts to improve coordination between international regimes, they seem generally to spawn further regulatory networks; any formal constitutionalization of international regimes seems unlikely.

KW - globalization law legitimacy constitution WTO tax haven

U2 - 10.1093/icon/mon017

DO - 10.1093/icon/mon017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 457

EP - 479

JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

SN - 1474-2640

IS - 3-4

ER -