Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constraints on the collision and the pre-collis...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Constraints on the collision and the pre-collision tectonic configuration between India and Asia from detrital geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry studies in the lower Indus basin, Pakistan

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Constraints on the collision and the pre-collision tectonic configuration between India and Asia from detrital geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry studies in the lower Indus basin, Pakistan. / Zhuang, Guangsheng; Najman, Yanina Manya Rachel; Guillot, Stephane et al.
In: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 432, 15.12.2015, p. 363-373.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Zhuang G, Najman YMR, Guillot S, Roddaz M, Antoine P-O, Metais G et al. Constraints on the collision and the pre-collision tectonic configuration between India and Asia from detrital geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry studies in the lower Indus basin, Pakistan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2015 Dec 15;432:363-373. Epub 2015 Nov 3. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.026

Author

Bibtex

@article{c7e965341e04474bacacf000a9e848f1,
title = "Constraints on the collision and the pre-collision tectonic configuration between India and Asia from detrital geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry studies in the lower Indus basin, Pakistan",
abstract = "Knowledge of the timing of India–Asia collision is a fundamental prerequisite for understanding the evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and its role in global climate, oceanic chemistry, and ecological evolution. Despite much active research, the basic pre-collision tectonic configuration and the timing of terminal India–Asia suturing remain debated. For example, debates regarding when and how the intervening Kohistan–Ladakh arc was sutured with India and Asia still remain elusive; some models propose the arc collided with Asia at about 100 Ma, with India–Asia collision at ca. 55 Ma, whilst a newer model proposed the arc's collision with India at 50 Ma and subsequently with Asia at 40 Ma. Another example is the recent proposition that an oceanic Greater India Basin separated the Tethyan Himalaya microcontinent from the remaining Indian plate until 20–25 Ma with the consumption of this oceanic basin marking the final collision at this time. These controversies relate to whether the commonly documented 50 Ma contact represents the terminal India–Asia suturing or the amalgamation between various arcs or microcontinents with India or Asia. Here we present an integrated provenance study of geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry on the late Cretaceous–Pleistocene sediments from the lower Indus basin on the Indian plate. The detrital zircon U–Pb and fission track data show a reversal in sediment source from a pure Indian signature to increasing inputs from the suture zone and the Asian plate between the middle Paleocene and early Oligocene. The Nd and Sr isotopes narrow down this change to 50 Ma by revealing input of Asian detritus and the establishment of a Nd & Sr isotopic pattern similar to the present-day Indus Fan by 50 Ma, with no significant variations up section, contrary to what might be expected if later major collisions had occurred. Our isotopic data indicate that Greater India was occupied by a fluvial-deltaic system, analogous to the present-day Indus and named as the Paleo-Indus, which has been transporting Asian detritus southward across the suture zone and Kohistan–Ladakh arc since 50 Ma, suggesting no other ocean basins intervened between India and Asia after this time in this region. Our data require that in the west the India–Asia collision were accomplished by ∼50 Ma.",
keywords = "India–Asia collision, Greater India Basin, Paleo-Indus River, Nd and Sr isotopes, zircon U–Pb & fission track",
author = "Guangsheng Zhuang and Najman, {Yanina Manya Rachel} and Stephane Guillot and Martin Roddaz and Pierre-Olivier Antoine and Gregoire Metais and Andrew Carter and Laurent Marivaux and Solangi, {Sarfraz H.}",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.026",
language = "English",
volume = "432",
pages = "363--373",
journal = "Earth and Planetary Science Letters",
issn = "0012-821X",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraints on the collision and the pre-collision tectonic configuration between India and Asia from detrital geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry studies in the lower Indus basin, Pakistan

AU - Zhuang, Guangsheng

AU - Najman, Yanina Manya Rachel

AU - Guillot, Stephane

AU - Roddaz, Martin

AU - Antoine, Pierre-Olivier

AU - Metais, Gregoire

AU - Carter, Andrew

AU - Marivaux, Laurent

AU - Solangi, Sarfraz H.

PY - 2015/12/15

Y1 - 2015/12/15

N2 - Knowledge of the timing of India–Asia collision is a fundamental prerequisite for understanding the evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and its role in global climate, oceanic chemistry, and ecological evolution. Despite much active research, the basic pre-collision tectonic configuration and the timing of terminal India–Asia suturing remain debated. For example, debates regarding when and how the intervening Kohistan–Ladakh arc was sutured with India and Asia still remain elusive; some models propose the arc collided with Asia at about 100 Ma, with India–Asia collision at ca. 55 Ma, whilst a newer model proposed the arc's collision with India at 50 Ma and subsequently with Asia at 40 Ma. Another example is the recent proposition that an oceanic Greater India Basin separated the Tethyan Himalaya microcontinent from the remaining Indian plate until 20–25 Ma with the consumption of this oceanic basin marking the final collision at this time. These controversies relate to whether the commonly documented 50 Ma contact represents the terminal India–Asia suturing or the amalgamation between various arcs or microcontinents with India or Asia. Here we present an integrated provenance study of geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry on the late Cretaceous–Pleistocene sediments from the lower Indus basin on the Indian plate. The detrital zircon U–Pb and fission track data show a reversal in sediment source from a pure Indian signature to increasing inputs from the suture zone and the Asian plate between the middle Paleocene and early Oligocene. The Nd and Sr isotopes narrow down this change to 50 Ma by revealing input of Asian detritus and the establishment of a Nd & Sr isotopic pattern similar to the present-day Indus Fan by 50 Ma, with no significant variations up section, contrary to what might be expected if later major collisions had occurred. Our isotopic data indicate that Greater India was occupied by a fluvial-deltaic system, analogous to the present-day Indus and named as the Paleo-Indus, which has been transporting Asian detritus southward across the suture zone and Kohistan–Ladakh arc since 50 Ma, suggesting no other ocean basins intervened between India and Asia after this time in this region. Our data require that in the west the India–Asia collision were accomplished by ∼50 Ma.

AB - Knowledge of the timing of India–Asia collision is a fundamental prerequisite for understanding the evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and its role in global climate, oceanic chemistry, and ecological evolution. Despite much active research, the basic pre-collision tectonic configuration and the timing of terminal India–Asia suturing remain debated. For example, debates regarding when and how the intervening Kohistan–Ladakh arc was sutured with India and Asia still remain elusive; some models propose the arc collided with Asia at about 100 Ma, with India–Asia collision at ca. 55 Ma, whilst a newer model proposed the arc's collision with India at 50 Ma and subsequently with Asia at 40 Ma. Another example is the recent proposition that an oceanic Greater India Basin separated the Tethyan Himalaya microcontinent from the remaining Indian plate until 20–25 Ma with the consumption of this oceanic basin marking the final collision at this time. These controversies relate to whether the commonly documented 50 Ma contact represents the terminal India–Asia suturing or the amalgamation between various arcs or microcontinents with India or Asia. Here we present an integrated provenance study of geochronology, thermochronology, and geochemistry on the late Cretaceous–Pleistocene sediments from the lower Indus basin on the Indian plate. The detrital zircon U–Pb and fission track data show a reversal in sediment source from a pure Indian signature to increasing inputs from the suture zone and the Asian plate between the middle Paleocene and early Oligocene. The Nd and Sr isotopes narrow down this change to 50 Ma by revealing input of Asian detritus and the establishment of a Nd & Sr isotopic pattern similar to the present-day Indus Fan by 50 Ma, with no significant variations up section, contrary to what might be expected if later major collisions had occurred. Our isotopic data indicate that Greater India was occupied by a fluvial-deltaic system, analogous to the present-day Indus and named as the Paleo-Indus, which has been transporting Asian detritus southward across the suture zone and Kohistan–Ladakh arc since 50 Ma, suggesting no other ocean basins intervened between India and Asia after this time in this region. Our data require that in the west the India–Asia collision were accomplished by ∼50 Ma.

KW - India–Asia collision

KW - Greater India Basin

KW - Paleo-Indus River

KW - Nd and Sr isotopes

KW - zircon U–Pb & fission track

U2 - 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.026

DO - 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.026

M3 - Journal article

VL - 432

SP - 363

EP - 373

JO - Earth and Planetary Science Letters

JF - Earth and Planetary Science Letters

SN - 0012-821X

ER -