Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases...
View graph of relations

Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence. / Tutton, R.
In: Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 32, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 172-195.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tutton R. Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2007 Mar;32(2):172-195. doi: 10.1177/0162243906296853

Author

Tutton, R. / Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence. In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 172-195.

Bibtex

@article{c5bd9f5f985a4f6384b8a80273fc719a,
title = "Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence.",
abstract = "This paper discusses the discourse of {\textquoteleft}participation{\textquoteright} in the context of genetic databases. Focusing on UK Biobank, it suggests that this discourse can be seen as a reflexive institutional response to public ambivalence towards science and expertise. Drawing on empirical evidence from focus groups, I explore how people from various backgrounds constructed and contested two different kinds of participation in UK Biobank. The first relates to people providing research materials to genetic databases and the second to people becoming {\textquoteleft}co-decision makers{\textquoteright} in these projects. My analysis highlights how focus groups positioned themselves and others in relation to UK Biobank and drew on a variety of {\textquoteleft}discursive repertoires{\textquoteright}, such as altruism, public ignorance, expertise, and lay empowerment. I conclude that discourses of participation reflect the way people position themselves and others - as experts, publics, patients, or research subjects - in relation to the opportunities and uncertainties of new biomedical research.",
keywords = "genetic databases • biobanks • participation • citizenship • ambivalence",
author = "R. Tutton",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology",
year = "2007",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/0162243906296853",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "172--195",
journal = "Science, Technology, and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance and Ambivalence.

AU - Tutton, R.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - This paper discusses the discourse of ‘participation’ in the context of genetic databases. Focusing on UK Biobank, it suggests that this discourse can be seen as a reflexive institutional response to public ambivalence towards science and expertise. Drawing on empirical evidence from focus groups, I explore how people from various backgrounds constructed and contested two different kinds of participation in UK Biobank. The first relates to people providing research materials to genetic databases and the second to people becoming ‘co-decision makers’ in these projects. My analysis highlights how focus groups positioned themselves and others in relation to UK Biobank and drew on a variety of ‘discursive repertoires’, such as altruism, public ignorance, expertise, and lay empowerment. I conclude that discourses of participation reflect the way people position themselves and others - as experts, publics, patients, or research subjects - in relation to the opportunities and uncertainties of new biomedical research.

AB - This paper discusses the discourse of ‘participation’ in the context of genetic databases. Focusing on UK Biobank, it suggests that this discourse can be seen as a reflexive institutional response to public ambivalence towards science and expertise. Drawing on empirical evidence from focus groups, I explore how people from various backgrounds constructed and contested two different kinds of participation in UK Biobank. The first relates to people providing research materials to genetic databases and the second to people becoming ‘co-decision makers’ in these projects. My analysis highlights how focus groups positioned themselves and others in relation to UK Biobank and drew on a variety of ‘discursive repertoires’, such as altruism, public ignorance, expertise, and lay empowerment. I conclude that discourses of participation reflect the way people position themselves and others - as experts, publics, patients, or research subjects - in relation to the opportunities and uncertainties of new biomedical research.

KW - genetic databases • biobanks • participation • citizenship • ambivalence

U2 - 10.1177/0162243906296853

DO - 10.1177/0162243906296853

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 172

EP - 195

JO - Science, Technology, and Human Values

JF - Science, Technology, and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 2

ER -