Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constructing Women’s Leadership Representation ...

Electronic data

  • Constructing_Women_s_Leadership_Representation_During_a_Time_of_Crisis_Feb_2017_FINAL

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Organization Studies, 39 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Organization Studies page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/oss on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 422 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Constructing Women’s Leadership Representation in the UK Press During a Time of Financial Crisis: Gender capitals and dialectical tensions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/01/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Organization Studies
Issue number1
Volume39
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)19-45
<mark>State</mark>Published
Early online date8/06/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

A continuing challenge for organizations is the persistent underrepresentation of women in senior roles, which gained a particular prominence during the global financial crisis (GFC). The GFC has raised questions regarding the forms of leadership that allowed the crisis to happen and alternative proposals regarding how future crises might be avoided. Within this context women’s leadership has been positioned as an ethical alternative to styles of masculinist leadership that led to the crisis in the first place. Through a multimodal discursive analysis this article examines the socio-cultural assumptions sustaining the gendering of leadership in the popular press to critically analyse how women’s leadership is represented during the GFC of 2008–2012. Highlighting the media’s portrayal of women’s leadership as a gendered field of activity where different forms of gender capital come into play, we identify three sets of dialectics: women as leaders and women as feminine, women as credible leaders and women as lacking in credibility, and women as victims and women as their own worst enemies. Together, the dialectics work together to form a discursive pattern framed by a male leadership model that narrates the promise of women leaders, yet the disappointment that they are not men. Our study extends understandings regarding how female and feminine forms of gender capital operate dialectically, where the media employs feminine capital to promote women’s positioning as leaders yet also leverages female capital as a constraint. We propose that this understanding can be of value to organizations to understand the impact and influence of discourse on efforts to promote women into leadership roles.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Organization Studies, 39 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Organization Studies page:
http://journals.sagepub.com/home/oss on SAGE Journals Online:
http://journals.sagepub.com/