Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Contract research today

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Contract research today: where do we stand?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Contract research today: where do we stand? / Mouzas, Stefanos; Blois, Keith.
In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 42, No. 7, 10.2013, p. 1057-1062.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mouzas, S & Blois, K 2013, 'Contract research today: where do we stand?', Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1057-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.025

APA

Vancouver

Mouzas S, Blois K. Contract research today: where do we stand? Industrial Marketing Management. 2013 Oct;42(7):1057-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.025

Author

Mouzas, Stefanos ; Blois, Keith. / Contract research today : where do we stand?. In: Industrial Marketing Management. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 7. pp. 1057-1062.

Bibtex

@article{d3170789d552422c9ee50d90d97e26fc,
title = "Contract research today: where do we stand?",
abstract = "New insights of empirical studies in contract research do not always conform to those that might be expected as a result of these theoretical studies. Much of the research into the nature and form of contracts has been of a theoretical nature and it is often referred as {\textquoteleft}relational contract{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}incomplete contract{\textquoteright} theory. In comparison, a limited number of empirical studies have been undertaken. This paper will set out the findings of these two major streams of theoretical analysis of contracts and then contrast them with recent empirical research into {\textquoteleft}framework contracts{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Incomplete Contract, Relational Contract, Framework Contract",
author = "Stefanos Mouzas and Keith Blois",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.025",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1057--1062",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract research today

T2 - where do we stand?

AU - Mouzas, Stefanos

AU - Blois, Keith

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - New insights of empirical studies in contract research do not always conform to those that might be expected as a result of these theoretical studies. Much of the research into the nature and form of contracts has been of a theoretical nature and it is often referred as ‘relational contract’ or ‘incomplete contract’ theory. In comparison, a limited number of empirical studies have been undertaken. This paper will set out the findings of these two major streams of theoretical analysis of contracts and then contrast them with recent empirical research into ‘framework contracts’.

AB - New insights of empirical studies in contract research do not always conform to those that might be expected as a result of these theoretical studies. Much of the research into the nature and form of contracts has been of a theoretical nature and it is often referred as ‘relational contract’ or ‘incomplete contract’ theory. In comparison, a limited number of empirical studies have been undertaken. This paper will set out the findings of these two major streams of theoretical analysis of contracts and then contrast them with recent empirical research into ‘framework contracts’.

KW - Incomplete Contract

KW - Relational Contract

KW - Framework Contract

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.025

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 1057

EP - 1062

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

IS - 7

ER -