Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Creating the competitive edge

Electronic data

  • Spring Hughes Mason McCaffrey 2017 Post-print

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 49-51, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003

    Accepted author manuscript, 758 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Creating the competitive edge: a new relationship between operations management and industrial policy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Creating the competitive edge : a new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. / Spring, Martin; Hughes, Alan; Mason, Katy; McCaffrey, Paul.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 49-51, 01.03.2017, p. 6-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{0e2acd39f3c249d8b2c946aa06123cbc,
title = "Creating the competitive edge: a new relationship between operations management and industrial policy",
abstract = "Policy interventions by governments to alter the structure of economic activity have either been dismissed or ignored by operations management (OM) scholars. However, in recent years, such ‘industrial policy’ measures have gained increasing support in developed economies, particularly in relation to manufacturing. This paper argues that contemporary manufacturing in high-cost economies is rooted in technological innovation. As such, it can be enhanced by industrial policy interventions that prevent systems failures in the process of turning technological innovation into commercially viable products. In particular, we argue that this can be achieved by establishing non-firm, intermediate research organizations and by other measures to change the institutional architecture of an economy. We disagree with claims in earlier OM literature that industrial policy is all but irrelevant to manufacturing firms and to OM. Instead, we argue that OM must broaden its conceptual scope so as to encompass active engagement with non-firm network participants such as government-supported intermediate research organizations, and that, as well as learning to be effective users of industrial policy, OM practitioners and academics should engage actively in the development of industrial policy. In this way, high-value, high-productivity manufacturing can be viable in high-cost economic environments.",
author = "Martin Spring and Alan Hughes and Katy Mason and Paul McCaffrey",
note = "This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 49-51, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "49-51",
pages = "6--19",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creating the competitive edge

T2 - a new relationship between operations management and industrial policy

AU - Spring, Martin

AU - Hughes, Alan

AU - Mason, Katy

AU - McCaffrey, Paul

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 49-51, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Policy interventions by governments to alter the structure of economic activity have either been dismissed or ignored by operations management (OM) scholars. However, in recent years, such ‘industrial policy’ measures have gained increasing support in developed economies, particularly in relation to manufacturing. This paper argues that contemporary manufacturing in high-cost economies is rooted in technological innovation. As such, it can be enhanced by industrial policy interventions that prevent systems failures in the process of turning technological innovation into commercially viable products. In particular, we argue that this can be achieved by establishing non-firm, intermediate research organizations and by other measures to change the institutional architecture of an economy. We disagree with claims in earlier OM literature that industrial policy is all but irrelevant to manufacturing firms and to OM. Instead, we argue that OM must broaden its conceptual scope so as to encompass active engagement with non-firm network participants such as government-supported intermediate research organizations, and that, as well as learning to be effective users of industrial policy, OM practitioners and academics should engage actively in the development of industrial policy. In this way, high-value, high-productivity manufacturing can be viable in high-cost economic environments.

AB - Policy interventions by governments to alter the structure of economic activity have either been dismissed or ignored by operations management (OM) scholars. However, in recent years, such ‘industrial policy’ measures have gained increasing support in developed economies, particularly in relation to manufacturing. This paper argues that contemporary manufacturing in high-cost economies is rooted in technological innovation. As such, it can be enhanced by industrial policy interventions that prevent systems failures in the process of turning technological innovation into commercially viable products. In particular, we argue that this can be achieved by establishing non-firm, intermediate research organizations and by other measures to change the institutional architecture of an economy. We disagree with claims in earlier OM literature that industrial policy is all but irrelevant to manufacturing firms and to OM. Instead, we argue that OM must broaden its conceptual scope so as to encompass active engagement with non-firm network participants such as government-supported intermediate research organizations, and that, as well as learning to be effective users of industrial policy, OM practitioners and academics should engage actively in the development of industrial policy. In this way, high-value, high-productivity manufacturing can be viable in high-cost economic environments.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49-51

SP - 6

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

ER -