Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cross-National CCTV Footage Shows Low Victimiza...

Electronic data

  • Postprint_Liebst, Philpot, Levine & Lindegaard (2020)

    Rights statement: ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/vio0000299

    Accepted author manuscript, 482 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Cross-National CCTV Footage Shows Low Victimization Risk for Bystander Interveners in Public Conflicts

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/01/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Psychology of Violence
Issue number1
Volume11
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)11-18
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date1/06/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Objective: Accumulating evidence shows that bystanders witnessing public disputes frequently intervene to help. However, little is known regarding the risks entailed for those bystanders who enter the fray to stop conflicts. This study systematically examined the prevalence of bystander victimizations and the associated risk factors. Method: Data were a cross-national sample of 93 surveillance camera recordings of real-life public disputes, capturing the potential victimizations of 417 intervening and 636 nonintervening bystanders. Results: Data showed that interveners were rarely physically harmed-at a rate of 3.6%-and noninterveners were virtually never victimized. Confirmatory regression results showed that conflict party affiliation was a moderately robust predictor of bystander victimization. The gender of the intervener was a highly fragile risk factor. More severe conflicts were not associated with a higher victimization likelihood. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the value of naturalistic observation for bystander research and emphasize the need for evidence-based bystander intervention recommendations. Data, materials, and postprint are available at osf.io/vyutj.

Bibliographic note

©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/vio0000299