Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Culture and behaviour in the English National H...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: Overview of lessons from a large multimethod study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Mary Dixon-Woods
  • Richard Baker
  • Kathryn Charles
  • Jeremy Dawson
  • Gabi Jerzembek
  • Graham Martin
  • Imelda McCarthy
  • Lorna McKee
  • Joel Minion
  • Piotr Ozieranski
  • Janet Willars
  • Patricia Wilkie
  • Michael West
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/02/2014
<mark>Journal</mark>BMJ Quality and Safety
Issue number2
Volume23
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)106-115
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Background Problems of quality and safety persist in health systems worldwide. We conducted a large research programme to examine culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service (NHS). Methods Mixed-methods study involving collection and triangulation of data from multiple sources, including interviews, surveys, ethnographic case studies, board minutes and publicly available datasets. We narratively synthesised data across the studies to produce a holistic picture and in this paper present a highlevel summary. Results We found an almost universal desire to provide the best quality of care. We identified many 'bright spots' of excellent caring and practice and high-quality innovation across the NHS, but also considerable inconsistency. Consistent achievement of high-quality care was challenged by unclear goals, overlapping priorities that distracted attention, and compliance-oriented bureaucratised management. The institutional and regulatory environment was populated by multiple external bodies serving different but overlapping functions. Some organisations found it difficult to obtain valid insights into the quality of the care they provided. Poor organisational and information systems sometimes left staff struggling to deliver care effectively and disempowered them from initiating improvement. Good staff support and management were also highly variable, though they were fundamental to culture and were directly related to patient experience, safety and quality of care. Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of clear, challenging goals for high-quality care. Organisations need to put the patient at the centre of all they do, get smart intelligence, focus on improving organisational systems, and nurture caring cultures by ensuring that staff feel valued, respected, engaged and supported.