Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interacti...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99. / Culpeper, Jonathan; Kyto, M.
In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2000, p. 175-199.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Culpeper, J & Kyto, M 2000, 'Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99.', Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul

APA

Culpeper, J., & Kyto, M. (2000). Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(2), 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul

Vancouver

Culpeper J, Kyto M. Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 2000;1(2):175-199. doi: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul

Author

Culpeper, Jonathan ; Kyto, M. / Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99. In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 2000 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 175-199.

Bibtex

@article{de2e58b9f24e41acb2823b11c0348748,
title = "Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99.",
abstract = "In this paper we examine four speech-related text types in terms of how linguistically close they are to spoken face-to-face interaction. Our “conversational” diagnostics include lexical repetitions, question marks (as an indicator of question-answer adjacency pairs), interruptions, and several single word interactive features (first- and second-person pronouns, private verbs and demonstrative pronouns). We discuss the nature of these diagnostics and then consider their distribution across our text types and across the period 1600 to 1720. We reveal: (1) a differential distribution across our text types (and suggest a number of explanatory factors), and (2) a shift over our period towards features associated with spoken face-to-face interaction (and make the tentative suggestion that this finding may be due to the development of “popular” literatures). We also make some preliminary remarks about our Shakespeare sample.",
author = "Jonathan Culpeper and M. Kyto",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "175--199",
journal = "Journal of Historical Pragmatics",
issn = "1566-5852",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. J. Hist. Pragmatics, 1(2), 2000, 175-99.

AU - Culpeper, Jonathan

AU - Kyto, M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this paper we examine four speech-related text types in terms of how linguistically close they are to spoken face-to-face interaction. Our “conversational” diagnostics include lexical repetitions, question marks (as an indicator of question-answer adjacency pairs), interruptions, and several single word interactive features (first- and second-person pronouns, private verbs and demonstrative pronouns). We discuss the nature of these diagnostics and then consider their distribution across our text types and across the period 1600 to 1720. We reveal: (1) a differential distribution across our text types (and suggest a number of explanatory factors), and (2) a shift over our period towards features associated with spoken face-to-face interaction (and make the tentative suggestion that this finding may be due to the development of “popular” literatures). We also make some preliminary remarks about our Shakespeare sample.

AB - In this paper we examine four speech-related text types in terms of how linguistically close they are to spoken face-to-face interaction. Our “conversational” diagnostics include lexical repetitions, question marks (as an indicator of question-answer adjacency pairs), interruptions, and several single word interactive features (first- and second-person pronouns, private verbs and demonstrative pronouns). We discuss the nature of these diagnostics and then consider their distribution across our text types and across the period 1600 to 1720. We reveal: (1) a differential distribution across our text types (and suggest a number of explanatory factors), and (2) a shift over our period towards features associated with spoken face-to-face interaction (and make the tentative suggestion that this finding may be due to the development of “popular” literatures). We also make some preliminary remarks about our Shakespeare sample.

U2 - 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul

DO - 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 175

EP - 199

JO - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

SN - 1566-5852

IS - 2

ER -