Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Deadly Force

Electronic data

  • Lethal_Force

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Security Dialogue 50 (4), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Security Dialogue page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/sdion SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 271 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Deadly Force: Contract, Killing, Sacrifice

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Deadly Force : Contract, Killing, Sacrifice. / Bradley, Arthur Humphrey.

In: Security Dialogue, Vol. 50, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 331-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bradley, Arthur Humphrey. / Deadly Force : Contract, Killing, Sacrifice. In: Security Dialogue. 2019 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 331-343.

Bibtex

@article{738e78899df642b1963e7d71db5934ee,
title = "Deadly Force: Contract, Killing, Sacrifice",
abstract = "This article proposes a political prehistory of drone theory that traces its juridico-political evolution from the 17th century to the present day. To outline my argument, I construct a constellation between Hobbes{\textquoteright}s theory of sovereign punishment in Leviathan and Chamayou{\textquoteright}s critique of drone warfare in Drone Theory to illuminate the political origins of drone violence. First, I argue that Hobbes{\textquoteright}s social contract theory lays the conceptual groundwork for Chamayou{\textquoteright}s drone theory. Second, I contend that Hobbes{\textquoteright}s theory of the sovereign punishment of domestic citizens preempts Chamayou{\textquoteright}s critique of drone warfare against foreign enemies. Finally, I speculate that Hobbes{\textquoteright}s theory of punishment is founded upon a sacrificial paradigm that returns in the phenomenon of domestic drone strikes. In summary, I argue that Hobbes might be something close to the first drone theorist insofar as his political theory systematically produces the state of exception between citizen and enemy in which the drone operates today. What, then, are the theoretical origins of drone warfare? How does the punishment of citizens prefigure drone warfare against foreign enemies? To what extent might even citizens themselves be a species of drone who may be activated by the sovereign at any point?",
keywords = "Chamayou, contract, drone, Hobbes, sacrifice",
author = "Bradley, {Arthur Humphrey}",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Security Dialogue 50 (4), 2019, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Security Dialogue page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/sdion SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/ ",
year = "2019",
month = aug
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0967010619843477",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "331--343",
journal = "Security Dialogue",
issn = "0967-0106",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deadly Force

T2 - Contract, Killing, Sacrifice

AU - Bradley, Arthur Humphrey

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Security Dialogue 50 (4), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Security Dialogue page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/sdion SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - This article proposes a political prehistory of drone theory that traces its juridico-political evolution from the 17th century to the present day. To outline my argument, I construct a constellation between Hobbes’s theory of sovereign punishment in Leviathan and Chamayou’s critique of drone warfare in Drone Theory to illuminate the political origins of drone violence. First, I argue that Hobbes’s social contract theory lays the conceptual groundwork for Chamayou’s drone theory. Second, I contend that Hobbes’s theory of the sovereign punishment of domestic citizens preempts Chamayou’s critique of drone warfare against foreign enemies. Finally, I speculate that Hobbes’s theory of punishment is founded upon a sacrificial paradigm that returns in the phenomenon of domestic drone strikes. In summary, I argue that Hobbes might be something close to the first drone theorist insofar as his political theory systematically produces the state of exception between citizen and enemy in which the drone operates today. What, then, are the theoretical origins of drone warfare? How does the punishment of citizens prefigure drone warfare against foreign enemies? To what extent might even citizens themselves be a species of drone who may be activated by the sovereign at any point?

AB - This article proposes a political prehistory of drone theory that traces its juridico-political evolution from the 17th century to the present day. To outline my argument, I construct a constellation between Hobbes’s theory of sovereign punishment in Leviathan and Chamayou’s critique of drone warfare in Drone Theory to illuminate the political origins of drone violence. First, I argue that Hobbes’s social contract theory lays the conceptual groundwork for Chamayou’s drone theory. Second, I contend that Hobbes’s theory of the sovereign punishment of domestic citizens preempts Chamayou’s critique of drone warfare against foreign enemies. Finally, I speculate that Hobbes’s theory of punishment is founded upon a sacrificial paradigm that returns in the phenomenon of domestic drone strikes. In summary, I argue that Hobbes might be something close to the first drone theorist insofar as his political theory systematically produces the state of exception between citizen and enemy in which the drone operates today. What, then, are the theoretical origins of drone warfare? How does the punishment of citizens prefigure drone warfare against foreign enemies? To what extent might even citizens themselves be a species of drone who may be activated by the sovereign at any point?

KW - Chamayou

KW - contract

KW - drone

KW - Hobbes

KW - sacrifice

U2 - 10.1177/0967010619843477

DO - 10.1177/0967010619843477

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 331

EP - 343

JO - Security Dialogue

JF - Security Dialogue

SN - 0967-0106

IS - 4

ER -