Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Dealing with spatial misalignment to model the ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Dealing with spatial misalignment to model the relationship between deprivation and life expectancy: a model-based geostatistical approach

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Dealing with spatial misalignment to model the relationship between deprivation and life expectancy : a model-based geostatistical approach. / Johnson, Olatunji; Diggle, Peter; Giorgi, Emanuele.

In: International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 19, 6, 04.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{98b9aeebed0d49b0bd1ae348c461a0c9,
title = "Dealing with spatial misalignment to model the relationship between deprivation and life expectancy: a model-based geostatistical approach",
abstract = "Background Life expectancy at birth (LEB), one of the main indicators of human longevity, has often been used to characterise the health status of a population. Understanding its relationships with the deprivation is key to develop policies and evaluate interventions that are aimed at reducing health inequalities. However, methodological challenges in the analysis of LEB data arise from the fact that different Government agencies often provide spatially aggregated information on LEB and the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) at different spatial scales. Our objective is to develop a geostatistical framework that, unlike existing methods of inference, allows to carry out spatially continuous prediction while dealing with spatial misalignment of the areal-level data.Methods We developed a model-based geostatistical approach for the joint analysis of LEB and IMD, when these are available over different partitions of the study region. We model the spatial correlation in LEB and IMD across the areal units using inter-point distances based on a regular grid covering the whole of the study area. The advantages and strengths of the new methodology are illustrated through an analysis of LEB and IMD data from the Liverpool district council.Results We found that the effect of IMD on LEB is stronger in males than in females, explaining about 63.35% of the spatial variation in LEB in the former group and 38.92% in the latter. We also estimate that LEB is about 8.5 years lower between the most and least deprived area of Liverpool for men, and 7.1 years for women. Finally, we find that LEB, both in males and females, is at least 80% likely to be above the England wide average only in some areas falling in the electoral wards of Childwall, Woolton and Church.Conclusion The novel model-based geostatistical framework provides a feasible solution to the spatial misalignment problem. More importantly, the proposed methodology has the following advantages over existing methods used model LEB: (1) it can deliver spatially continuous inferences using spatially aggregated data; (2) it can be applied to any form of misalignment with information provided at a range of spatial scales, from areal-level to pixel-level.",
keywords = "Deprivation, Life expectancy, Likelihood-based inference, Model-based geostatistics, Spatial misalignment, Health inequality",
author = "Olatunji Johnson and Peter Diggle and Emanuele Giorgi",
year = "2020",
month = mar
day = "4",
doi = "10.1186/s12942-020-00200-w",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "International Journal of Health Geographics",
issn = "1476-072X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with spatial misalignment to model the relationship between deprivation and life expectancy

T2 - a model-based geostatistical approach

AU - Johnson, Olatunji

AU - Diggle, Peter

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

PY - 2020/3/4

Y1 - 2020/3/4

N2 - Background Life expectancy at birth (LEB), one of the main indicators of human longevity, has often been used to characterise the health status of a population. Understanding its relationships with the deprivation is key to develop policies and evaluate interventions that are aimed at reducing health inequalities. However, methodological challenges in the analysis of LEB data arise from the fact that different Government agencies often provide spatially aggregated information on LEB and the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) at different spatial scales. Our objective is to develop a geostatistical framework that, unlike existing methods of inference, allows to carry out spatially continuous prediction while dealing with spatial misalignment of the areal-level data.Methods We developed a model-based geostatistical approach for the joint analysis of LEB and IMD, when these are available over different partitions of the study region. We model the spatial correlation in LEB and IMD across the areal units using inter-point distances based on a regular grid covering the whole of the study area. The advantages and strengths of the new methodology are illustrated through an analysis of LEB and IMD data from the Liverpool district council.Results We found that the effect of IMD on LEB is stronger in males than in females, explaining about 63.35% of the spatial variation in LEB in the former group and 38.92% in the latter. We also estimate that LEB is about 8.5 years lower between the most and least deprived area of Liverpool for men, and 7.1 years for women. Finally, we find that LEB, both in males and females, is at least 80% likely to be above the England wide average only in some areas falling in the electoral wards of Childwall, Woolton and Church.Conclusion The novel model-based geostatistical framework provides a feasible solution to the spatial misalignment problem. More importantly, the proposed methodology has the following advantages over existing methods used model LEB: (1) it can deliver spatially continuous inferences using spatially aggregated data; (2) it can be applied to any form of misalignment with information provided at a range of spatial scales, from areal-level to pixel-level.

AB - Background Life expectancy at birth (LEB), one of the main indicators of human longevity, has often been used to characterise the health status of a population. Understanding its relationships with the deprivation is key to develop policies and evaluate interventions that are aimed at reducing health inequalities. However, methodological challenges in the analysis of LEB data arise from the fact that different Government agencies often provide spatially aggregated information on LEB and the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) at different spatial scales. Our objective is to develop a geostatistical framework that, unlike existing methods of inference, allows to carry out spatially continuous prediction while dealing with spatial misalignment of the areal-level data.Methods We developed a model-based geostatistical approach for the joint analysis of LEB and IMD, when these are available over different partitions of the study region. We model the spatial correlation in LEB and IMD across the areal units using inter-point distances based on a regular grid covering the whole of the study area. The advantages and strengths of the new methodology are illustrated through an analysis of LEB and IMD data from the Liverpool district council.Results We found that the effect of IMD on LEB is stronger in males than in females, explaining about 63.35% of the spatial variation in LEB in the former group and 38.92% in the latter. We also estimate that LEB is about 8.5 years lower between the most and least deprived area of Liverpool for men, and 7.1 years for women. Finally, we find that LEB, both in males and females, is at least 80% likely to be above the England wide average only in some areas falling in the electoral wards of Childwall, Woolton and Church.Conclusion The novel model-based geostatistical framework provides a feasible solution to the spatial misalignment problem. More importantly, the proposed methodology has the following advantages over existing methods used model LEB: (1) it can deliver spatially continuous inferences using spatially aggregated data; (2) it can be applied to any form of misalignment with information provided at a range of spatial scales, from areal-level to pixel-level.

KW - Deprivation

KW - Life expectancy

KW - Likelihood-based inference

KW - Model-based geostatistics

KW - Spatial misalignment

KW - Health inequality

U2 - 10.1186/s12942-020-00200-w

DO - 10.1186/s12942-020-00200-w

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

JO - International Journal of Health Geographics

JF - International Journal of Health Geographics

SN - 1476-072X

M1 - 6

ER -