Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Meeting abstract › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Meeting abstract › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Deliberative panels
T2 - developing recommendations for supporting stakeholder and user involvement
AU - Brearley, Sarah G.
AU - Blake, Susan
AU - Milligan, Christine
AU - Seamark, D.
AU - Thomas, Colleen
AU - Turner, Mary
AU - Wang, Xu
AU - Payne, Sheila A.
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - Background: It is recognised that research in Palliative Care needs to integrate stakeholder and user engagement. Alongside research planning and conduct this can also assist in developing recommendations for policy and clinical practice. Aim: This paper considers a Deliberative Panel approach to the dialogic processing of preliminary data findings from family carer's reflections on dying at home (Unpacking the Home). Though similar to consensus techniques in qualitative research, this approach aims to engage key stakeholders in the process of transforming research findings into policy recommendations. Methods: Two deliberative panels with a total of 31 key stakeholders were held in the UK (Lancaster and London). Key stakeholders included policy makers, clinicians, academics and service users. A four phase deliberative panel was adopted. Phase 1: presentation of preliminary data findings; Phase 2: facilitated discussions; Phase 3: feedback of discussions and identification of recommendations to change policy/practice; Phase 4: ranking of recommendations for presentation to policy makers. Results: Four overarching areas of recommendations for policy and clinical practice were identified: i) practical strategies need to be developed to support family carers at home (key workers, caregiver needs, assistance with medication management, and bereavement follow up); ii) guidance is needed on information (initiatives such as 'tell me once', and information on support before and after death); iii) the importance of place of care over place of death and the potential for the voluntary sector to provide support; and iv) a radical review is needed of the way in which personal social care is provided in order to meet the individualised needs of family carers. Conclusion: This paper suggests a strategy for palliative care researchers to integrate their findings into practical policy recommendations in a transparent and integrative manner, based on public values and attitudes.
AB - Background: It is recognised that research in Palliative Care needs to integrate stakeholder and user engagement. Alongside research planning and conduct this can also assist in developing recommendations for policy and clinical practice. Aim: This paper considers a Deliberative Panel approach to the dialogic processing of preliminary data findings from family carer's reflections on dying at home (Unpacking the Home). Though similar to consensus techniques in qualitative research, this approach aims to engage key stakeholders in the process of transforming research findings into policy recommendations. Methods: Two deliberative panels with a total of 31 key stakeholders were held in the UK (Lancaster and London). Key stakeholders included policy makers, clinicians, academics and service users. A four phase deliberative panel was adopted. Phase 1: presentation of preliminary data findings; Phase 2: facilitated discussions; Phase 3: feedback of discussions and identification of recommendations to change policy/practice; Phase 4: ranking of recommendations for presentation to policy makers. Results: Four overarching areas of recommendations for policy and clinical practice were identified: i) practical strategies need to be developed to support family carers at home (key workers, caregiver needs, assistance with medication management, and bereavement follow up); ii) guidance is needed on information (initiatives such as 'tell me once', and information on support before and after death); iii) the importance of place of care over place of death and the potential for the voluntary sector to provide support; and iv) a radical review is needed of the way in which personal social care is provided in order to meet the individualised needs of family carers. Conclusion: This paper suggests a strategy for palliative care researchers to integrate their findings into practical policy recommendations in a transparent and integrative manner, based on public values and attitudes.
KW - United Kingdom
KW - bereavement
KW - caregiver
KW - clinical practice
KW - consensus
KW - death
KW - feedback system
KW - follow up
KW - human
KW - medication therapy management
KW - palliative therapy
KW - planning
KW - policy
KW - processing
KW - qualitative research
KW - scientist
KW - social care
KW - worker
U2 - 10.1177/0269216314532748
DO - 10.1177/0269216314532748
M3 - Meeting abstract
VL - 28
SP - 641
EP - 642
JO - Palliative Medicine
JF - Palliative Medicine
SN - 0269-2163
IS - 6
ER -