Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Democracy in international law
View graph of relations

Democracy in international law: A european perspective

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Democracy in international law: A european perspective. / Wheatley, Steven.
In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.04.2002, p. 225-248.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Wheatley, S 2002, 'Democracy in international law: A european perspective', International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.2.225

APA

Wheatley, S. (2002). Democracy in international law: A european perspective. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51(2), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.2.225

Vancouver

Wheatley S. Democracy in international law: A european perspective. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2002 Apr 1;51(2):225-248. doi: 10.1093/iclq/51.2.225

Author

Wheatley, Steven. / Democracy in international law : A european perspective. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2002 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 225-248.

Bibtex

@article{ae38478580a94edaad312f0df556984f,
title = "Democracy in international law: A european perspective",
abstract = "For lawyers in general, and international lawyers in particular, democracy is a neglected concept. Discourse is dominated by the ideas of human rights for individuals and minority or self-determination rights for groups. Those who seek greater protection for vulnerable members of a community argue for the recognition of new rights, or the more effective implementation of existing rights. They do not argue for more democracy. Indeed, given that claims for human and minority rights are not made only against authoritarian governments, but also democratic ones, there must exist an implied assumption that democracy is, by itself, not capable of protecting the interests of vulnerable minorities. Moreover, as the form of government which apparently venerates the will of the majority, democracy might be considered by some as being downright hostile to the interests of individuals and minorities.",
author = "Steven Wheatley",
year = "2002",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/iclq/51.2.225",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "225--248",
journal = "International and Comparative Law Quarterly",
issn = "0020-5893",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democracy in international law

T2 - A european perspective

AU - Wheatley, Steven

PY - 2002/4/1

Y1 - 2002/4/1

N2 - For lawyers in general, and international lawyers in particular, democracy is a neglected concept. Discourse is dominated by the ideas of human rights for individuals and minority or self-determination rights for groups. Those who seek greater protection for vulnerable members of a community argue for the recognition of new rights, or the more effective implementation of existing rights. They do not argue for more democracy. Indeed, given that claims for human and minority rights are not made only against authoritarian governments, but also democratic ones, there must exist an implied assumption that democracy is, by itself, not capable of protecting the interests of vulnerable minorities. Moreover, as the form of government which apparently venerates the will of the majority, democracy might be considered by some as being downright hostile to the interests of individuals and minorities.

AB - For lawyers in general, and international lawyers in particular, democracy is a neglected concept. Discourse is dominated by the ideas of human rights for individuals and minority or self-determination rights for groups. Those who seek greater protection for vulnerable members of a community argue for the recognition of new rights, or the more effective implementation of existing rights. They do not argue for more democracy. Indeed, given that claims for human and minority rights are not made only against authoritarian governments, but also democratic ones, there must exist an implied assumption that democracy is, by itself, not capable of protecting the interests of vulnerable minorities. Moreover, as the form of government which apparently venerates the will of the majority, democracy might be considered by some as being downright hostile to the interests of individuals and minorities.

U2 - 10.1093/iclq/51.2.225

DO - 10.1093/iclq/51.2.225

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85017104271

VL - 51

SP - 225

EP - 248

JO - International and Comparative Law Quarterly

JF - International and Comparative Law Quarterly

SN - 0020-5893

IS - 2

ER -