Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex: a comparison of context and multi-filter LN models

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex : a comparison of context and multi-filter LN models. / Westö, Johan; May, Patrick.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 120, No. 2, 08.2018, p. 703-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Westö, Johan ; May, Patrick. / Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex : a comparison of context and multi-filter LN models. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2018 ; Vol. 120, No. 2. pp. 703-719.

Bibtex

@article{e9eaa7a5d28e4704a93560195ea71fb5,
title = "Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex: a comparison of context and multi-filter LN models",
abstract = "Receptive field (RF) models are an important tool for deciphering neural responses to sensory stimuli. The two currently popular RF models are multi-filter linear-nonlinear (LN) models and context models. Models are, however, never correct and they rely on assumptions to keep them simple enough to be interpretable. As a consequence, different models describe different stimulus-response mappings, which may or may not be good approximations of real neural behavior. In the current study, we take up two tasks: First, we introduce new ways to estimate context models with realistic nonlinearities, that is, with logistic and exponential functions. Second, we evaluate context models and multi-filter LN models in terms of how well they describe recorded data from complex cells in cat primary visual cortex. Our results, based on single-spike information and correlation coefficients, indicate that context models outperform corresponding multi-filter LN models of equal complexity (measured in terms of number of parameters), with the best increase in performance being achieved by the novel context models. Consequently, our results suggest that the multi-filter LN-model framework is suboptimal for describing the behavior of complex cells: the context-model framework is clearly superior while still providing interpretable quantizations of neural behavior.",
keywords = "Receptive field, Complex cell, Context model, LN model, Stimulus-response mapping",
author = "Johan West{\"o} and Patrick May",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1152/jn.00916.2017",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "703--719",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex

T2 - a comparison of context and multi-filter LN models

AU - Westö, Johan

AU - May, Patrick

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Receptive field (RF) models are an important tool for deciphering neural responses to sensory stimuli. The two currently popular RF models are multi-filter linear-nonlinear (LN) models and context models. Models are, however, never correct and they rely on assumptions to keep them simple enough to be interpretable. As a consequence, different models describe different stimulus-response mappings, which may or may not be good approximations of real neural behavior. In the current study, we take up two tasks: First, we introduce new ways to estimate context models with realistic nonlinearities, that is, with logistic and exponential functions. Second, we evaluate context models and multi-filter LN models in terms of how well they describe recorded data from complex cells in cat primary visual cortex. Our results, based on single-spike information and correlation coefficients, indicate that context models outperform corresponding multi-filter LN models of equal complexity (measured in terms of number of parameters), with the best increase in performance being achieved by the novel context models. Consequently, our results suggest that the multi-filter LN-model framework is suboptimal for describing the behavior of complex cells: the context-model framework is clearly superior while still providing interpretable quantizations of neural behavior.

AB - Receptive field (RF) models are an important tool for deciphering neural responses to sensory stimuli. The two currently popular RF models are multi-filter linear-nonlinear (LN) models and context models. Models are, however, never correct and they rely on assumptions to keep them simple enough to be interpretable. As a consequence, different models describe different stimulus-response mappings, which may or may not be good approximations of real neural behavior. In the current study, we take up two tasks: First, we introduce new ways to estimate context models with realistic nonlinearities, that is, with logistic and exponential functions. Second, we evaluate context models and multi-filter LN models in terms of how well they describe recorded data from complex cells in cat primary visual cortex. Our results, based on single-spike information and correlation coefficients, indicate that context models outperform corresponding multi-filter LN models of equal complexity (measured in terms of number of parameters), with the best increase in performance being achieved by the novel context models. Consequently, our results suggest that the multi-filter LN-model framework is suboptimal for describing the behavior of complex cells: the context-model framework is clearly superior while still providing interpretable quantizations of neural behavior.

KW - Receptive field

KW - Complex cell

KW - Context model

KW - LN model

KW - Stimulus-response mapping

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00916.2017

DO - 10.1152/jn.00916.2017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 120

SP - 703

EP - 719

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 2

ER -