12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Design of the circulation improving resuscitati...
View graph of relations

« Back

Design of the circulation improving resuscitation care (CIRC) trial: a new state of the art design for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

  • E. Brooke Lerner
  • David Persse
  • Chris Souders
  • Fritz Sterz
  • Reinhard Malzer
  • Michael Lozano
  • Mark Westfall
  • Marc A. Brouwer
  • Pierre M. van Grunsven
  • Anne Whitehead
  • Jan-Aage Olsen
  • Ulrich R. Herken
  • Lars Wik
Journal publication date03/2011
JournalResuscitation
Journal number3
Volume82
Number of pages6
Pages294-299
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Purpose
Mechanical chest compression devices, such as the AutoPulse®, have been developed to overcome problems associated with manual CPR (M-CPR). Animal and human studies have shown that AutoPulse CPR improves hemodynamic parameters over M-CPR. However, human studies conducted in the prehospital setting have conflicting results as to the AutoPulse's efficacy in improving survival. The Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care (CIRC) Trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated AutoPulse-CPR (iA-CPR) (i.e., M-CPR followed by AutoPulse®-CPR) in a randomized controlled trial that addresses methodological issues that may have influenced the results of previous studies.

Methods
This paper describes the methodology of the CIRC trial.

Results
Unlike previous trials the CIRC trial studies iA-CPR where emphasis is placed on reducing “hands-off” time. The trial has six unique features: (1) training of all EMS providers in a standardized deployment strategy that reduces hands-off time and continuous monitoring for protocol compliance. (2) A pre-trial simulation study of provider compliance with the trial protocol. (3) Three distinct study phases (in-field training, run-in, and statistical inclusion) to minimize the Hawthorne effect and other biases. (4) Monitoring of the CPR process using either transthoracic impedance or accelerometer data. (5) Randomization at the subject level after the decision to resuscitate is made to reduce selection bias. (6) Use of the Group Sequential Double Triangular Test with sufficient power to determine superiority, inferiority, or equivalence.

Conclusion
This unique, large, multicenter study comparing the effectiveness of iA-CPR to M-CPR will contribute to the science of the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as well as to the design of future trials.