TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of activation energy of amorphous to crystalline transformation for Se90Te10 using isoconversional methods

AU - Abdelazim, Nema Mohamed Safwat Ibrahim

AU - Abdel-Latief, A.Y.

AU - Abu-Sehly, A.A.

AU - Abdel-Rahim, M.A.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - The activation energies of crystallization of Se90Te10 glass were studied at different heating rates (4–50 K/min) under non-isothermal conditions using a differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) technique. The activation energy was determined by analyzing the data using the Matusita et al. method. A strong heating rate dependence of the activation energy was observed. The variation of the activation energy was analyzed by the application of the three isoconversional methods, of Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS), Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO), and Vyazovkin. These methods confirm that the activation energy of crystallization is not constant but varies with the degree of crystallization and hence with temperature. This variation indicates that the transformation from amorphous to crystalline phase is a complex process involving different mechanisms of nucleation and growth. On the other hand, the validity of the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami (JMA) model to describe the crystallization process for the studied composition was discussed. Results obtained by directly fitting the experimental DSC to the calculated DSC curve indicate that the crystallization process of the Se90Te10 glass cannot be satisfactorily described by the JMA model. In general, simulation results indicate that the Sestak–Berggren (SB) model is more suitable to describe the crystallization kinetics.

AB - The activation energies of crystallization of Se90Te10 glass were studied at different heating rates (4–50 K/min) under non-isothermal conditions using a differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) technique. The activation energy was determined by analyzing the data using the Matusita et al. method. A strong heating rate dependence of the activation energy was observed. The variation of the activation energy was analyzed by the application of the three isoconversional methods, of Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS), Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO), and Vyazovkin. These methods confirm that the activation energy of crystallization is not constant but varies with the degree of crystallization and hence with temperature. This variation indicates that the transformation from amorphous to crystalline phase is a complex process involving different mechanisms of nucleation and growth. On the other hand, the validity of the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami (JMA) model to describe the crystallization process for the studied composition was discussed. Results obtained by directly fitting the experimental DSC to the calculated DSC curve indicate that the crystallization process of the Se90Te10 glass cannot be satisfactorily described by the JMA model. In general, simulation results indicate that the Sestak–Berggren (SB) model is more suitable to describe the crystallization kinetics.

KW - DSC

KW - Crystallization kinetics

KW - Chalcogenide glass

KW - Activation energy

KW - Isoconversional methods

U2 - 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.01.012

M3 - Journal article

VL - 387

SP - 79

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

JF - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

SN - 0022-3093

ER -