Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Developmental trends in adaptive memory
View graph of relations

Developmental trends in adaptive memory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Developmental trends in adaptive memory. / Otgaar, Henry; Howe, Mark L.; Smeets, Tom et al.
In: Memory, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2014, p. 103-117.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Otgaar, H, Howe, ML, Smeets, T & Garner, S 2014, 'Developmental trends in adaptive memory', Memory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.781653

APA

Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Smeets, T., & Garner, S. (2014). Developmental trends in adaptive memory. Memory, 22(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.781653

Vancouver

Otgaar H, Howe ML, Smeets T, Garner S. Developmental trends in adaptive memory. Memory. 2014;22(1):103-117. Epub 2013 Mar 22. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.781653

Author

Otgaar, Henry ; Howe, Mark L. ; Smeets, Tom et al. / Developmental trends in adaptive memory. In: Memory. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 103-117.

Bibtex

@article{9419eeda29f942548f41eb49f1a7b50f,
title = "Developmental trends in adaptive memory",
abstract = "Recent studies have revealed that memory is enhanced when information is processed for fitness-related purposes. The main objective of the current experiments was to test developmental trends in the evolutionary foundation of memory using different types of stimuli and paradigms. In Experiment 1, 11-year-olds and adults were presented with neutral, negative, and survival-related DRM word lists. We found a memory benefit for the survival-related words and showed that false memories were more likely to be elicited for the survival-related word lists than for the other lists. Experiment 2 examined developmental trends in the survival processing paradigm using neutral, negative, and survival-related pictures. A survival processing advantage was found for survival-related pictures in adults, for negative pictures in 11/12-year-olds, and for neutral pictures in 7/8-year-olds. In Experiment 3, 11/12-year-olds and adults had to imagine the standard survival scenario or an adapted survival condition (or pleasantness condition) that was designed to reduce the possibilities for elaborative processing. We found superior memory retention for both survival scenarios in children and adults. Collectively, our results evidently show that the survival processing advantage is developmentally invariant and that certain proximate mechanisms (elaboration and distinctiveness) underlie these developmental trends.",
keywords = "Adaptive memory, Proximate mechanisms, False memory , Memory , Development",
author = "Henry Otgaar and Howe, {Mark L.} and Tom Smeets and Sarah Garner",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2013.781653",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "103--117",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "1464-0686",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental trends in adaptive memory

AU - Otgaar, Henry

AU - Howe, Mark L.

AU - Smeets, Tom

AU - Garner, Sarah

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent studies have revealed that memory is enhanced when information is processed for fitness-related purposes. The main objective of the current experiments was to test developmental trends in the evolutionary foundation of memory using different types of stimuli and paradigms. In Experiment 1, 11-year-olds and adults were presented with neutral, negative, and survival-related DRM word lists. We found a memory benefit for the survival-related words and showed that false memories were more likely to be elicited for the survival-related word lists than for the other lists. Experiment 2 examined developmental trends in the survival processing paradigm using neutral, negative, and survival-related pictures. A survival processing advantage was found for survival-related pictures in adults, for negative pictures in 11/12-year-olds, and for neutral pictures in 7/8-year-olds. In Experiment 3, 11/12-year-olds and adults had to imagine the standard survival scenario or an adapted survival condition (or pleasantness condition) that was designed to reduce the possibilities for elaborative processing. We found superior memory retention for both survival scenarios in children and adults. Collectively, our results evidently show that the survival processing advantage is developmentally invariant and that certain proximate mechanisms (elaboration and distinctiveness) underlie these developmental trends.

AB - Recent studies have revealed that memory is enhanced when information is processed for fitness-related purposes. The main objective of the current experiments was to test developmental trends in the evolutionary foundation of memory using different types of stimuli and paradigms. In Experiment 1, 11-year-olds and adults were presented with neutral, negative, and survival-related DRM word lists. We found a memory benefit for the survival-related words and showed that false memories were more likely to be elicited for the survival-related word lists than for the other lists. Experiment 2 examined developmental trends in the survival processing paradigm using neutral, negative, and survival-related pictures. A survival processing advantage was found for survival-related pictures in adults, for negative pictures in 11/12-year-olds, and for neutral pictures in 7/8-year-olds. In Experiment 3, 11/12-year-olds and adults had to imagine the standard survival scenario or an adapted survival condition (or pleasantness condition) that was designed to reduce the possibilities for elaborative processing. We found superior memory retention for both survival scenarios in children and adults. Collectively, our results evidently show that the survival processing advantage is developmentally invariant and that certain proximate mechanisms (elaboration and distinctiveness) underlie these developmental trends.

KW - Adaptive memory

KW - Proximate mechanisms

KW - False memory

KW - Memory

KW - Development

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2013.781653

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2013.781653

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23521432

VL - 22

SP - 103

EP - 117

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 1464-0686

IS - 1

ER -