12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Diallel analysis of maize lines with contrastin...
View graph of relations

« Back

Diallel analysis of maize lines with contrasting responses to applied nitrogen.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date10/2004
JournalJournal of Agricultural Science
Journal number5
Volume142
Number of pages7
Pages535-541
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Six S5 lines of maize, previously identified as having contrasting responses to nitrogen (N) supply, were used to carry out a complete series of diallel crosses. The resulting 15 hybrids were grown in a field at two N levels. The general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were estimated using the method 4, model I analysis of Griffing for grain yield kernel weight, grain number, harvest index, green leaf number, ear leaf area, N utilization efficiency, total plant N, grain N content, anthesis-silking interval, chlorophyll content and prolificacy. For the majority of the traits, GCA was more important than SCA and there was an increase of non-additive effects under low N. Significant interactions were observed between GCA and N levels for grain yield, grain number and chlorophyll content, indicating the selection of different lines for each N level. The lines with the largest effects of N supply per se on grain yield, were those with the largest effects of GCA for this trait. This association indicates that the response of the lines to N supply, should be considered in breeding programmes in order to achieve acceptable hybrids for environments with both high and low N.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=AGS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Agricultural Science, 142 (5), pp 535-541 2004, © 2004 Cambridge University Press.