Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Differences and similarities of stellar populat...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • 2004.11175v1

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version P Arrabal Haro, J M Rodríguez Espinosa, C Muñoz-Tuñón, D Sobral, A Lumbreras-Calle, M Boquien, A Hernán-Caballero, L Rodríguez-Muñoz, B Alcalde Pampliega, Differences and similarities of stellar populations in LAEs and LBGs at z ∼ 3.4−6.8, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 495, Issue 2, June 2020, Pages 1807–1824 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/495/2/1807/5831076?redirectedFrom=fulltext

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.12 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Differences and similarities of stellar populations in LAEs and LBGs at z~3.4-6.8

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • P. Arrabal Haro
  • J. M. Rodríguez Espinosa
  • C. Muñoz-Tuñón
  • D. Sobral
  • A. Lumbreras-Calle
  • M. Boquien
  • A. Hernán-Caballero
  • L. Rodríguez-Muñoz
  • B. Alcalde Pampliega
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/06/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Issue number2
Volume495
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)1807–1824
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Lyman alpha emitters (LAEs) and Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) represent the most common groups of star-forming galaxies at high z, and the differences between their inherent stellar populations (SPs) are a key factor in understanding early galaxy formation and evolution. We have run a set of SP burst-like models for a sample of 1558 sources at 3.4 < z < 6.8 from the Survey for High-z Absorption Red and Dead Sources (SHARDS) over the GOODS-N field. This work focuses on the differences between the three different observational subfamilies of our sample: LAE–LBGs, no-Ly α LBGs, and pure LAEs. Single and double SP synthetic spectra were used to model the spectral energy distributions, adopting a Bayesian information criterion to analyze under which situations a second SP is required. We find that the sources are well modelled using a single SP in ∼79 per cent of the cases. The best models suggest that pure LAEs are typically young low-mass galaxies (⁠t∼26+41−25 Myr; Mstar∼5.6+12.0−5.5×108 M⁠), undergoing one of their first bursts of star formation. On the other hand, no-Ly α LBGs require older SPs (t ∼ 71 ± 12 Myr), and they are substantially more massive (Mstar ∼ 3.5 ± 1.1 × 109 M⊙). LAE–LBGs appear as the subgroup that more frequently needs the addition of a second SP, representing an old and massive galaxy caught in a strong recent star-forming episode. The relative number of sources found from each subfamily at each z supports an evolutionary scenario from pure LAEs and single SP LAE–LBGs to more massive LBGs. Stellar mass functions are also derived, finding an increase of M* with cosmic time and a possible steepening of the low-mass slope from z ∼ 6 to z ∼ 5 with no significant change to z ∼ 4. Additionally, we have derived the SFR–Mstar relation, finding an SFR∝Mβstar behaviour with negligible evolution from z ∼ 4 to z ∼ 6.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version P Arrabal Haro, J M Rodríguez Espinosa, C Muñoz-Tuñón, D Sobral, A Lumbreras-Calle, M Boquien, A Hernán-Caballero, L Rodríguez-Muñoz, B Alcalde Pampliega, Differences and similarities of stellar populations in LAEs and LBGs at z ∼ 3.4−6.8, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 495, Issue 2, June 2020, Pages 1807–1824 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/495/2/1807/5831076?redirectedFrom=fulltext