Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Differential effects of antecedent- and respons...
View graph of relations

Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Poster

Published

Standard

Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. / Gallo, Inge Schweiger; McCulloch, Kathleen; Gollwitzer, Peter M.
2010. 21 Poster session presented at Society for the Study of Motivation , United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Poster

Harvard

APA

Gallo, I. S., McCulloch, K., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. 21. Poster session presented at Society for the Study of Motivation , United States. http://www.thessm.org/conference%20program%202010.pdf

Vancouver

Gallo IS, McCulloch K, Gollwitzer PM. Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. 2010. Poster session presented at Society for the Study of Motivation , United States.

Author

Gallo, Inge Schweiger ; McCulloch, Kathleen ; Gollwitzer, Peter M. / Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. Poster session presented at Society for the Study of Motivation , United States.1 p.

Bibtex

@conference{e5657c0461bf4ff0b99518fd81879313,
title = "Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust",
abstract = "As little is known about the effectiveness of different types of implementation intentions on the regulation of emotions, the present studies aimed at disentangling whether different implementation intentions help in down-regulating disgust responses. In Study 1, two antecedent-focused implementation intentions based on attentional deployment and cognitive reappraisal allowed participants to rate disgusting pictures as being less unpleasant than participants in the control condition or the goal intention condition. However, this effectiveness did not extend to feeling less excited after seeing the unpleasant slides. In Study 2, participants with a response-focused implementation intention, which aimed specifically at regulating the intensity of the emotional experience, reported a lower evoked arousal after seeing the disgusting slides, but didn{\textquoteleft}t rate the pictures as being less unpleasant. Thus, implementation intentions were shown to exert differential effects depending on whether they are formulated in terms of regulating one or another emotional dimension.",
author = "Gallo, {Inge Schweiger} and Kathleen McCulloch and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
pages = "21",
note = "Society for the Study of Motivation ; Conference date: 05-05-2011",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Differential effects of antecedent- and response-focused implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust

AU - Gallo, Inge Schweiger

AU - McCulloch, Kathleen

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - As little is known about the effectiveness of different types of implementation intentions on the regulation of emotions, the present studies aimed at disentangling whether different implementation intentions help in down-regulating disgust responses. In Study 1, two antecedent-focused implementation intentions based on attentional deployment and cognitive reappraisal allowed participants to rate disgusting pictures as being less unpleasant than participants in the control condition or the goal intention condition. However, this effectiveness did not extend to feeling less excited after seeing the unpleasant slides. In Study 2, participants with a response-focused implementation intention, which aimed specifically at regulating the intensity of the emotional experience, reported a lower evoked arousal after seeing the disgusting slides, but didn‘t rate the pictures as being less unpleasant. Thus, implementation intentions were shown to exert differential effects depending on whether they are formulated in terms of regulating one or another emotional dimension.

AB - As little is known about the effectiveness of different types of implementation intentions on the regulation of emotions, the present studies aimed at disentangling whether different implementation intentions help in down-regulating disgust responses. In Study 1, two antecedent-focused implementation intentions based on attentional deployment and cognitive reappraisal allowed participants to rate disgusting pictures as being less unpleasant than participants in the control condition or the goal intention condition. However, this effectiveness did not extend to feeling less excited after seeing the unpleasant slides. In Study 2, participants with a response-focused implementation intention, which aimed specifically at regulating the intensity of the emotional experience, reported a lower evoked arousal after seeing the disgusting slides, but didn‘t rate the pictures as being less unpleasant. Thus, implementation intentions were shown to exert differential effects depending on whether they are formulated in terms of regulating one or another emotional dimension.

M3 - Poster

SP - 21

T2 - Society for the Study of Motivation

Y2 - 5 May 2011

ER -