12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Diffusion coefficients of metals and metal comp...
View graph of relations

« Back

Diffusion coefficients of metals and metal complexes in hydrogels used in diffusive gradients in thin films.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date3/02/2006
JournalAnalytica Chimica Acta
Journal number1-2
Volume558
Number of pages8
Pages222-229
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Diffusion coefficients of metal ions and metal–ligand complexes in hydrogels were measured at ionic strengths of 0.1–100 mmol L−1 using a diffusion cell. The three different types of hydrogel were all based on polyacrylamide and have been commonly used in the technique of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT), where accurate diffusion coefficients are essential for the assessment of the concentrations of labile metal in solution. There was little difference in the diffusion coefficients of either Cu and Cd measured in gels with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mm, showing that any diffusion boundary layer in solution was negligibly small. The diffusion coefficients of Pb, Ni, Cu and Cd in simple inorganic solutions was independent of ionic strength (1–100 mmol L−1), except at very low ionic strengths (0.1 mmol L−1) where the value of D was 50% lower. This observation is consistent with the gel having a positive charge that creates a Donnan partitioning of cations at the gel surface. Diffusion coefficient of Pb complexes decreased with increasing size of the ligand, in the order of diglycolic acid (DGA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), fulvic acid and humic acid. In freshwaters the contribution of fulvic acid species to measured DGT mass should be considered. No significant difference was found between the rate of diffusion of Cu and Cd through the mostly commonly used gel and the filter membrane at the face of the DGT device. Diffusion coefficients obtained using a gel with small pore size (restricted gel) plus filter membrane were higher than those obtained using the restricted gel alone. It may be necessary to modify the standard DGT equation for restricted gel deployments, to take into account the difference in diffusion between the gel and the filter membrane.