Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Digital traces of behavior within addiction

Electronic data

  • Accepted manuscript

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9855-7

    Accepted author manuscript, 168 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 3/01/19

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

  • 10.1007/s11469-017-9855-7

    Rights statement: © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    Final published version, 361 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Digital traces of behavior within addiction: Response to Griffiths (2017)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>02/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Issue number1
Volume16
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)240-245
StatePublished
Early online date3/01/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Griffiths’ (2017) response to the recent commentary piece by Ryding and Kaye (2017) on “Internet Addiction: A conceptual minefield” provided a useful critique and extension of some key issues. We take this opportunity to further build upon on one of these issues to provide some further insight into how the field of “internet addiction” (IA) or technological addictions more generally, may benefit from capitalising on behavioural data. As such, this response extends Griffiths’ (2007) points surrounding the efficacy of behavioural data previously used in studies on problematic gambling, to consider its merit for future research on IA or associated topics such as Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) or “Smartphone addiction”. Within this, we highlight the challenges associated with utilising behavioural data but provide some practical solutions which may support researchers and practitioners in this field. These recent developments could, in turn, advance our understanding and potentially validate such concepts by establishing behavioural correlates, conditions and contexts. Indeed, corroborating behavioural metrics alongside self-report measures presents a key opportunity if scholars and practitioners are to move the field forward.

Bibliographic note

© The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.